[情報] 5/26 Q&A

[WillieHuang (Willie)]

- Storm on quoting Discovery Channel (Great Tank Battles show) as a
historical source: “Discovery is even more laughable than Wikipedia. My
source are our historical consultants.” (SS: the question was, whether there
were Tigers in Ardennes – there were a few, they didn’t fight though)

有人引用探索頻道（Great Tank Battles 節目），Storm：「它比維基百科更可笑。我的
資料來源是我們的歷史顧問。」

- for now, developers aren’t considering removing the rule where both sides
have to have the same amount of arty (and scouts) (SS: this rule is not
absolute, I think there is +/-1 tolerance)

不打算移除讓兩邊火砲（和偵查車）數量一致的規則（SS: 有正負一的容忍值）

- Storm states that when it comes to historicity of guns in World of Tanks –
 made up tanks (WT E-100) can have any gun that fits, historical tanks can
only have guns they had in real life

Storm 表示，當要 WoT 要求史實時，架空車可用任何一門合用的砲，而實際的車就只能裝
史實砲。

- Storm regarding the assault mode: “What is there to comment? It’s a
normal mode. I play it from the beginning without switching it off.”

Storm 不覺得突擊模式有什麼問題。（意譯）

- Storm, explaining why assault and encounter modes don’t have their own
specialized maps and responding to a player who claims they are bland:
“Because we don’t consider it rational to make maps for those mods only.
You personally decide the level of blandness of a mode? Are there any normal
criteria that determine “blandness”? Assault and Encounter mode are
finished and polished. Historical battles are in the state of finding the
correct solution.”

不認為突擊/遭遇模式應該有專屬地圖。（略譯）

- Storm reacting on the “28 bots in one game” video: “You’d have to find
out what is shown in there in general and how it happened. Personally, I don’
t have time to do this on Sunday. Sorry.”

關於1場28隻BOT的影片，Storm 表示這不干他的事。（意譯）

- according to Storm, the TD share in battles has long since stopped growing
and now is within normal frame. WG checks every month.

據 Storm 說法，戰場上 TD 所佔的比重已經很久沒成長了，目前還在合理範圍。WG 每個
月都檢查。

- too many TD’s in battles? “Statistics do not confirm that” and “We do
not observe the dominance of TD’s”

TD 太多？「數據無法證實。」「並未看到大TD時代出現。」

- long map loading? “We are investigate this issue”

地圖讀取花很多時間？「我們正在研究。」

- Storm states that the IS-7 buff planned was a hoax started by Jove (Russian
streamer), there will be no buff (SS: to my eternal shame, I jumped on this
too – basically, he – or someone else – photoshopped a fake screenshot of
“Storm’s post”)

Storm 表示IS-7 buff 計畫是一個由 Jove（俄國玩家）所發起的騙局，buff 不會發生。

- Storm doesn’t know whether the A45/FV201 will be a tier 7 or 8 and when
will it come

Storm 也不清楚 A45/FV201 會是七或八階車，以及何時出現。

- situations where you get the same map several times in a row are apparently
okay

連進同一張圖好幾場的狀況是正常的。

http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/26/26-5-2014/

--
        In church, they say to forgive!

        Forgiveness is between them and God;

              it's my job to arrange the meeting.           《 Man on Fire 》

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 125.231.19.201
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/WoT/M.1401218762.A.89C.html
推 windycat    :IS7~ 不升DPM至少升一點金彈穿深嘛:3
推 Yijhen0525  :探索頻道的節目本就有些不公正,十大戰艦裡沒大和號
→ Yijhen0525  :就算沒戰績好歹還有帳面數據
推 LeonBolton  :Discovery的十大XX都有個"量產數量"的評測項目
→ LeonBolton  :大和級太耗資源 只生產兩艘 GG
→ korsg       :IS-7 不期不待 不受傷害...這台太中庸了XDD
推 ykes60513   :太好了 WG還是有點良心的 就算是親兒子也不能太寵他
→ hitlerx     :IS-7不是親兒子 是乾兒子
推 fxp87117    :有IS7的話CW一定有上場機會 苦力永遠不嫌多XD
推 KusoPvt     :IS-7炮實在太爛