推 crazyalf:conflict?or controversial? 08/16 09:57
推 DeltaEcho:寫得很淺顯易懂～：） 08/16 18:39
※ 引述《KarateWu (慢郎中)》之銘言：
: Actually, "good service" and "good price" are not always controversal,
: especially if the shops "dare" share all information about this feild with
: customers honsetly but try hard to suck buyers' pocket and do the brain-washing
: by all kinds of commericals.
這種無謂的高調就可以省省了。
在資訊開放的地方，比價人人都會，但是價格戰並不是唯一的營運指南。而且我也
講得很清楚，"theoretically"。這個論點的基礎很簡單: service costs。
除非你能夠拿什麼學理來證明服務可以無成本地進行，否則，在其他變因皆得到控制
的情境下，good service 與 good price 之間有相當程度的排斥關係。
至於服務要做到怎樣的程度、價格可以低到怎樣的程度，這是車店自己權衡斟酌。
如果你仍然要抱持著 "賣方會無所不用其極地掏我口袋" 的心態來跟車店打交道，
那麼你應該抱著資本論上街頭革命還比較實際。
: Obviously, I am not like someone who works for bike-shops. What "i" am doing
: is just let you know that you pay the price you deserve espeically in
: the place like Taiwan and the feild like the bike.
上面這段話未免太託大了。從你之前對於其他人提到零售店向車廠進貨的平均成本
數字嗤之以鼻的反應，就可以知道你對於這個產業有多外行。說句坦白話，倘若
真的聽你的意見為參考，無異於問道於盲。
: If you are reaching a
: certain model of bikes, try to ask several different shops and cut the price
: within 10-20% off to the owner(remerber, not clerks). At least, don't let the
: owners think you are a typical uncle sam with truthly deep pocket. To the
: shops with Gaint signboard, you msut keep that in mind.
有商業規模的買者會以量議價。
有人際手腕的買者會以交情商價。
自行具備技術的老手不必倚賴車店，可以多方詢價比價。
唯有無知的買者會走進店裡，天真到以為找老闆亂殺一通就可以打到八折。
言盡於此。
--
- Mjolnyr -
Hamarr, helga ve veita ok hindra alla illska.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.71.81.91
※ 編輯: Mjolnyr 來自: 61.71.81.91 (08/16 03:03)