推 fightback:thx220.136.126.191 05/20
※ 引述《fightback (to be)》之銘言：
: My course of English Composition requires us to submit
: a research paper with a certain topic.
: I'd like to write about Homeric question with the conclusion
: that Homer didn't exist. Accordingly, the idea flashes into my head.
: I think of whether Shakespeare did exist that probably is usful to
: support the thesis statement I want after my making the comparison and
: analysis between Homer and Shkaespeare.
: However, I have the problem that I'm not sure I did read the relevant
: material, or why can't I find that kind of information now.
: Can anybody give me a hand to tell me
: is there the Shakespearian question with references if possible.
: Homer是否存在為爭議性的話題
: 有些學者認為Homer不過是個被創造出來的名詞以解釋
: Iliad and Odyssey作品的存在
: 這就是所謂的Homeric question.
: 同樣的 我印象中好像讀過Shakespear也有被質疑
: 是否真有其人 或 眾多劇本是否真為他所作
: 有些人提出 "Shakespeare" 不過是個眾多無名小卒作品的掛名
: 我想請問:
: 關莎士比亞這部分是我印象錯誤還是真的有此說?
: 如果不是我印象錯誤的話 但好像又找不到"莎翁被質疑是否存在"相關資料
: 能否請眾板友提供一下這方面資料.
有人提出很多假設
說莎士比亞本身並沒有寫這些東西.
有人說那些劇本其實是Bacon寫的, 有人說是Ben Johson寫的;
不過這些假設其實也都很片面
比真有莎士比亞其實人的證據少很多很多.
台灣書店好像可以找到一本書
叫做"莎士比亞不存在?"之類的.
不過我覺得,
we don't have to buy the whole story.
or, just like postmodernism may lead us to ask,
what's an author and what's a text,
so what's Shakespeare?
what ARE Shakespeares?
--
縱然陽光可以帶給人們希望
但也要心中充滿希望
才看得到陽光!!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.224.52.148