[討論] Practise for the essay `the Defense of Poesy'

[n3oanderson (T. J.)]

Not very sure if this is the right place to ask. But here it goes ...

Is anyone interested in reading and discussing the essay `the defense of
Poesy'?

The plan is not anything special. Basically we would walk through the essay
paragraph by paragraph; then discuss what would be the point or any thought
of it whilst reading. For instance, what's difference between he who deals
with matters philosophical and right poets? Or we may chose one to do the
presentation in turns.

There is no time limit for such practise; however, we may finish because
- we've finished the whole essay
- or not enough members.

These are just preliminary thought; any suggestion is welcome. In addition,
this is not for homework, so please do not expect any answer from there.

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 124.9.139.10
※ 編輯: n3oanderson     來自: 124.9.139.10         (07/04 20:32)
推 spacedunce5:correct typos and grammar first
推 celestial09:I think this is very interesting!:D
→ celestial09:but I am too busy now, can I reply
→ celestial09:10 days later? ^^
※ 編輯: n3oanderson     來自: 124.9.139.10         (07/05 12:50)
→ n3oanderson:I don't anticipate too many people
→ n3oanderson:joining in;so generally no deadline
推 spacedunce5:i just realized it should be
→ spacedunce5:defen"c"e @@
推 spacedunce5:有點長@@
→ hecati:I think both are correct. It's just that
→ hecati:the Brits use "defence" more
→ hecati:(or so my dictionary says :) )
推 celestial09:Do we have to read John Selden's
→ celestial09:whole book as reference? or only
→ celestial09:the essay? I think this book is
→ celestial09:fantastic! It brodens my horizon!