Regarding to the discussion of the essay `The Defense of Poesy,' the focus
would be on the essay itself. But there is no restriction on the source
used; you are freely to either read the whole book, or simply employ concepts
derived from authors you prefer.
Nonetheless, the discussion would focus more on whether the argument is with
supporting evidences or not because I prefer this kind of discussion to be
formal to just chatting.
※ 引述《celestial09 (Koouos :D)》之銘言：
: Who is reading this book now? I think this is a fantastic book for beginners
: like me. Although I haven't finish the whole reading, this book already sheds
: a lot of light and insights to my perception of poems. Sometimes I have no
: idea why I started to write poems, or why I write it, with an unceasing
: impulse. Maybe after I finish reading this book it can answer some of my
: concerns and questions?
: However, there are some sentences and concepts that are a bit confusing to me.
: Will you be interested in clarifying it or dicussing it to gether?
: Thanks a lot for your guidance!
: How delightful! :D
: Cheers!
: Sincerely,
: Celestial09
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 124.9.128.254