[情報] 一篇關於版友討論時常犯錯誤的文章

[Iamaidiot (雜種...那又怎樣)]

http://www.intrepidsoftware.com/fallacy/attack.php

Attacking the Person (argumentum ad hominem)


Definition:

The person presenting an argument is attacked instead of the argument itself.
This takes many forms. For example,the person's character, nationality or
religion may be attacked. Alternatively, it may be pointed out that a person
stands to gain from a favourable outcome. Or, finally, a person may be attacked
by association, or by the company he keeps.
There are three major forms of Attacking the Person:

ad hominem (abusive): instead of attacking an assertion, the argument attacks
the person who made the assertion.
ad hominem (circumstantial): instead of attacking an assertion the author
points to the relationship between the person making the assertion and the
person's circumstances.
ad hominem (tu quoque): this form of attack on the person notes that a person
does not practise what he preaches.


Examples:
You may argue that God doesn't exist, but you are just following a fad. (ad
hominem abusive)
We should discount what Premier Klein says about taxation because he won't be
hurt by the increase. (ad hominem circumstantial)

We should disregard Share B.C.'s argument because they are being funded by the
 logging industry. (ad hominem circumstantial)

You say I shouldn't drink, but you haven't been sober for more than a year. (
ad hominem tu quoque)
Proof:

Identify the attack and show that the character or circumstances of the person
 has nothing to do with the truth or falsity of the proposition being defended.


References:

Barker: 166, Cedarblom and Paulsen: 155, Copi and Cohen: 97, Davis: 80

--
我...喜歡過你唷y^_^y
但是...請不要再出現在我夢裏了
夢見你讓我真的覺得很幸福
可是...夢裏多幸福,醒來之後就多孤獨
不過,還是要謝謝那段日子你給我的笑容跟謝謝你給我這場好夢
別了 

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.139.130.137
→ TMWSTW:那討論基礎在那裡？
※ 編輯: Iamaidiot       來自: 220.139.133.38       (04/12 00:38)
※ 編輯: Iamaidiot       來自: 61.217.105.148       (11/18 12:33)
→ soug1y:http://0rz.net/3c1Pa
推 namfish:罷免王金平
→ namfish:推措
→ chikiki:不知道哪個候選人選舉連政見都提不出來
推 chikiki:推錯了,可以刪掉嗎?
推 amperp:BALA
推 amperp:BALA
推 amperp:BALA
推 amperp:大推
→ sodier:公的肥肉包 ?
推 wildtender:找不出論點 , 便做人生攻擊 ,此真理也
推 phantasm:回你一句話 這種心態台灣永遠都不會進步
→ phantasm:推錯篇  抱歉
→ shouri:葉菊蘭 就是深綠急獨的代表 蘇貞昌反而不是
→ ghostforever:泛藍的根本連那網站都懶得上去，跟資
→ ghostforever:訊又有何關係？一個不能代表任何事情
→ ghostforever:的東西還奢望別人隨你們起舞？
→ ghostforever:...........推錯篇了...-_-
→ longstay:我是出了名的人來瘋啊 哈哈 刪
推 brea:這應該是邱毅和他有預謀  裝的啦
→ nalee:民共和國
推 moonshade:abc
→ jeanvanjohn:那我投訴對方說我"洗腦過度",可以嗎?
推 airmike:從李登輝出走之後
→ airmike:推錯.
推 ivanos:推錯