› 看板 translator 關於我們 聯絡資訊
作者lifegetter (白浪)
看板translator
標題Re: [徵求] 報價_筆_英譯中_企管統計_四頁_20090717
時間Tue Jul 14 08:23:51 2009
※ 引述《leonado (暱稱)》之銘言： : ────────────────────────────────────── : [選]試 譯 文： : AIMS OF THE PRESENT STUDY : An integrated model based on the literature review and hypotheses generated : above is imultaneously tested in the present study. The research aims to : contribute to the both the employee well being and service climate : literature. The model tested examines the predicted associations between : service climate and job induced tension,job satisfaction and psychological : dysfunction as indicators of employee wellbeing. This investigation is : undertaken in the context of the university environment where it is argued : that the increasing ‘consumerisation’ of students may be a source of job : pressure for university staff. 試改寫： Research Goals This paper contributes to the literature on employee well being as well as service climate through testing the integrated model described in the earlier sections. A study is conducted in a university to examine the associations between service climate and job-induced tension, using job satisfaction and psychological dysfunctions as indicators; and the findings suggest that the increasing "consumerisation" of students may be a cause for job pressure on university staff. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ※ 編輯: lifegetter 來自: 210.240.249.200 (07/14 08:52)
→ lifegetter:做什麼，怎麼做，結果...緒論是背景：為什麼要做 07/14 08:55
→ pepejaja:改的真好.... 07/14 12:38
→ lifegetter:哈哈，所以老外的英文一樣有改進的空間 XD 07/14 13:08
→ leonado:你寫的我比較看的懂耶.... 07/14 13:16
→ pepejaja:簡潔有力啊..不過都是可以得懂!!! 07/14 14:08
推 jubilee:我覺得原文還蠻Chinglish的耶....原作者可能是華人? 07/14 15:55
→ lifegetter:Angela Martin, U of Tasmaria 澳洲 07/14 17:30
→ lifegetter:http://tinyurl.com/lazf9x 看意思還好 要照翻是煩了些 07/14 17:35
推 BBMak:我也覺得原來文章寫法似乎也滿常見的，只是繁瑣了點 07/14 17:43
→ lifegetter:恩，如：將錯誤訊息經搜尋正確資料並取代之 ==> 修正 07/14 17:47
→ lifegetter:這...照原文字數計費就比較划算 XD 07/14 17:49
→ usread:研究活動與研究結果宜用過去式.現在式主在「真理」 07/14 20:14
→ lifegetter:恩，a study was conducted. 07/14 20:32
→ usread:yes,研究論文的主要時態是過去式,這一點要把握住 07/14 20:52
推 bigbuddha:其實我覺得原文寫得比較好 只是有一些typos就是 07/14 21:09
推 bigbuddha:如(s)imultaneously 與 contribute to (刪the) both the 07/14 21:12
→ lifegetter:論文該用的時態基本上有兩種看法，一個就是 usread 所 07/15 20:53
→ lifegetter:說的。我常用的是「真理」與「模型描述」用現在式，過 07/15 20:54
→ lifegetter:程描述（如實驗過程）用過去式。所以很可能在「描述該 07/15 20:55
→ lifegetter:做什麼」時會用現在式，然後「以實驗為例」的描述時又 07/15 20:56
→ lifegetter:變成過去式。我想這兩種時態變換並不彼此牴觸，而在審 07/15 20:58
→ lifegetter:稿過程不見得會有嚴重影響（minor revision 或期刊有專 07/15 21:00
→ lifegetter:人小修文法）。但是因果混雜的寫法會造成審稿者的困擾 07/15 21:01
→ lifegetter:或誤解，很可能會以「很難看懂」一下刷掉或列入 major 07/15 21:02
→ lifegetter:revision。目前看到臺灣論文的罩門就是這混雜不清。 XD 07/15 21:03
→ lifegetter:小小八卦，有些期刊主編會把夾雜不清的稿件丟給專業大 07/15 21:06
→ lifegetter:刀來砍，很可能被砍後只能收到「要分清因果」的回應。 07/15 21:07
→ lifegetter:像這篇文章（沒去仔細審，因為已發表了 XD）我會建議作 07/15 21:09
→ lifegetter:者以簡潔些的句型撰寫，而有些在邀稿文中就會這樣要求 07/15 21:11