→ onedollar:說再多不相信的人還是不相信 贏了怎樣^_^ 推 211.74.60.131 11/27
雖然眾說紛紜..
不過看ESPN的..尤其是像我這麼不專心的傢伙
(就是沒仔細看個二三十遍外加一隻放大鏡)
很容易跟那隻蘇東一樣認為是誤判
不過ESPN自己當時攝影機角度也有問題...
容易造成誤解～
例如Handball...我當時看了都會以為是指進球門後的那個手球
但後來才發現Rivaldo的姿勢指的是他認為Raul進球前有手球..(由時間差來論.)
而裁判當初一開始的姿勢雖是手球(如果是裁判手舉起來的那個動作)..
但看外國媒體上寫的最後結論是越位--->包括邊審亦這樣認定
而我看ESPN的...從頭到尾焦點都錯誤>.<...
看成手球..而且以為是進球門後的那一粒..>"<... .錯上加錯
從頭到尾都沒想到越位問題
而有沒有誤判...看ESPN的很容易認為是誤判
(至少我就這樣被誤導了..蘇東那個死傢伙..下次決改聽英文的)
由外國媒體的一些消息～
OFFSIDE: MILAN WERE DAMAGED
Corriere dello Sport- Stadio agrees on Raul's offside.The Roma-based paper
adds: 'There were two other incidents. About a quarter into the second half
Rivaldo played the ball through to Seedorf who broke into Real area. A
non-existent offside was given. Shevchenko was probably offside, but wasn't
involved in the action. Four minutes later another superb pass from the
Hollander put the Ukrainian clear. Sheva was set up behind the Spanish defence,
but he was flagged offside all the same'.
GOOD MEIER: RAUL WAS OFFSIDE
Gazzetta dello Sport points out: 'With seven minutes left on clock Milan
shake: corner from the left, Dida fails to save, Zidane header and Raul finds
the net, although Serginho tries to save. The goal is disallowed because of
Raul offside: when Zidane nods the ball, there's just one Rossonero (Serginho)
before the Spanish forward'
關於越位～不翻譯了..大致上來說就是認為的確Raul有越位
米蘭自己反而有些球被誤判越位....但實際上沒有的....-__________-|||
另外...我必須佩服名裁判梅爾...在一團混亂中他能抓得出來(邊審也有功勞)
的確不簡單....看樣子以後有可能會壓過科里納...(科里納最近很怪..)
世界盃的英巴之戰好像就是他主判的樣子......
--
"儘管我不再為AC米蘭效力，
但我的心始終牽掛著它，直到永遠。"
~Van Basten~
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.csie.ntu.edu.tw)
◆ From: 218.184.27.40
※ 編輯: blancha 來自: 218.184.27.40 (11/27 20:20)
※ 編輯: blancha 來自: 218.184.27.40 (11/27 20:34)