推 blache:謝謝，請問那您是認為has與had都可以解釋得通囉? 03/06 00:02
→ Aelian:文法上我認為had才對，但細看這文，文法真的不太對勁…… 03/06 00:08
※ 引述《blache (就是喜歡你... )》之銘言：
: 一篇閱讀中的文章如下
: A-ya is a famous artist in Taiwan. She is not from rih family, but
: studying abroad ______ always benn her dream.
: One year ago, she decided to quit her job and leave for the USA.
: Everyone was surprised and couldn't believe she would give up her show
: business.............
: A-ya has gone to the USA for a year, and her fans in Taiwan miss
: her very much. ......They want A-ya to know that they will wait for her
: coming.
: 請問空格中該填入的是 have 或 had
: 答案給的是 had ，請問該如何解釋?
: 我的想法是因為下文提到她已經去美國留學了，所以對她來說，去國外念書這件事情
: 已經是過去的夢想。
: 但是好像又覺得卡卡的....
: 請問該如何解釋較好?
: 謝謝!
我教過去完成式時都會說「比過去式更早」再搭老梗時間線圖;科見教務主任出的文法書
則索性說「過去完成式一定要跟過去式搭在一起」，所以這文的語法會怪或許是因為「
現在式-過去完成式-過去式」之故(其實用過去完成式也對，因為"studying abroad"已非
A-ya's dream)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 123.240.196.249