Re: [國中] 97年第二次基測題 so that用法

[myglory (紅蘋果)]

※ 引述《myglory (紅蘋果)》之銘言：
: 今天整理基測題發現97年第二次基測題第九題
: 9.
: Albert usually brings a ______ with him when he takes a trip, so that he
: can write down what he sees on the road.
: (A) camera
: (B) dictionary
: (C) notebook
: (D) watch
: 題目中so that前加了逗號，原因為何呢?
: 我和同事討論了一下，
: 以為是因為句子太長，為了斷句清楚，但仍不確定是否如此。

根據版友提供的網址
是否可以用Rule 3來解釋呢?

Use a comma to set off introductory elements, as in "Running toward third
base, he suddenly realized how stupid he looked."

It is permissible to omit the comma after a brief introductory element if the
omission does not result in confusion or hesitancy in reading. If there is
ever any doubt, use the comma, as it is always correct.

因為原本的句子應該是Albert usually brings a notebook with him (when
he takes a trip) so that he can write down what he sees on the road.
為了避免混淆後面兩個地位不等的子句when he takes~及 he can write~
所以才用逗點分開?



: 如果句子換成下方:
: When Albert takes a trip, Albert ususally brings a ______ with him so that
: he can write down what he sees on the road.
: so that前方可加逗號嗎?
: 謝謝大家~

所以換成上方這一句時
he usually brings a notebook with him和he can write down~
兩個句子地位相等
so that前方應該是不能加逗點的

這樣的解釋是否可以呢?


感謝大家的解答~

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) 
◆ From: 122.120.35.29
→ dunchee:1. 你要先思考的是什麼是"introductory element"。並不是
→ dunchee:在前頭的就是introductory element
→ dunchee:2. "原本的句子應該是"-> 我會建議你不要這樣子想。兩個句
→ dunchee:子也許"剛好"傳達一樣(or很近似)的意思，但是這不表示他
→ dunchee:們之間存在有"誰原本是誰的表示法"的這關係
→ dunchee:3. "這樣的解釋是否可以呢?" -> It's possible. 不過你要
→ dunchee:想的是"兩個句子地位相等"的意義/意思是什麼。比如，如果"
→ dunchee:我"主要是要傳達Albert有帶本note，然後"so that ..."之
→ dunchee:後只是個added information (not something essential)?
→ dunchee:這是否一定不可能/不行?