經過十幾年了，台灣的英語教學和測驗方式還雷同於十幾年前，
這種完全以＂ａｐｔｉｔｕｄｅ＂的導向教學已經讓我們在大學聯考ＴＯＥＩＣ和IBT
的檢定考試看到成果了。難道當老師的我們不用去想我們教學背後給學生帶來的訊息？
一味的講解文法與結構去忽略到英文和生活當中的連結，什麼叫做從學生的角度去教學？
就拿英文句子的ｉｎｖｅｒｓｉｏｎ為例，學生連基本句法概念都尚未能應用到寫作上
就考一大堆奇怪的ｉｎｖｅｒｓｉｏｎ. I guess one may intend to make students
abhor the very thought of English. I have to say "structures" are substantial
,but are these structures meaningful to students? Are they able to feel
connected? English, unlike any other subject matter, is a practical and learnable
one. I truly doubt why some of us would make it so "hideous" and detached to
students' lives. Of course, opinions may vary individually. Just my personal
thinking.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.231.113.120
※ 編輯: rich09piper 來自: 118.231.113.120 (11/29 15:15)