精華區beta Acad-Affairs 關於我們 聯絡資訊
※ 引述《hsnudrum (寶寶加油喔!:))》之銘言: : ※z《dvlin (Dee)》之銘言: : : 2. Which would you choose: a high-paying job with long hours that would : : give you little time with family and friends or a lower-paying job with : : shorter hours that would give you more time with family and friends? : : Explain your choice, using specific reasons and details. : There are some people prefer to a high-paying job with long hours, but others xxxxxxxxx Some xx while : prefer to a lower-paying job with shorter hours. The way I see it, I would xx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx If I were to make a choice, : choose the later one. In the following discussion, I would reason and provide latter xxxxxxxxxx : evidence to support my viewpoint. But the last sentence is still strange. Readers would know the evidence presented when they keep on reading the essay. : First, I think the most important thing is to spend time accompanying my : family and friends. The family-time is invaluable, which cannot be bought by ------------------------- : money. After a hard-working day, the only thing I want to do is to accompany -----redundant. The word "invaluable" already indicates "cannot be bought by money." : my family, and chat with my friends, only in this time can I completely relax x ; : and refill my energy for the work tomorrow. coming : In addition, if I chose high-paying job with long hours, I would spend no have : time studying English, which I suppose the most important thing I should do is supposed to be the most... : after work. So if I had no time to study, I would probably loose my lose : competitiveness in the society. I think there are no better reasons that can : demonstrate this point. If you can see it, you will understand it more deeply. : To sum up, given the reasons discussed above, which sometimes forms and -----what does it refer to? : organic whole and thus become more persuasive, I can safely reach the -------------? ---------------------------? : conclusion that I prefer to lower-paying job with shorter hours. xx ^a * The two arguments presented here are not very strong. There are, of course, some descriptions about your points, but those are generally common sense and not well-supported with enough evidence or more convincing examples. And still, the essay should be longer. ^^" For your reference. ^^; fleuve -- 有一 ,會發現我是株 ──╪── fleuve 的植物1mK︴30m直到有一天我眼睛 ──╪── 看不見自己、卻可以看見 -- ※ 編輯: fleuve 來自: 118.168.40.70 (07/02 04:12)
hsnudrum:Thanks you very much!! ^^ 07/03 00:22
hsnudrum:最後那句應該是 which sometimes forms an organic whole 07/03 00:25
hsnudrum:and thus become more persuasive, I can... 07/03 00:26
hsnudrum:Actually, this sentence is copied from the Internet 07/03 00:29
hsnudrum:I really don't know how to make a good conclusion @@ 07/03 00:30
hsnudrum:Does it proper to put the sentence in the conclusion? 07/03 00:33