精華區beta AfterPhD 關於我們 聯絡資訊
人在紐約 前兩天跟我的美國同學聊起洪蘭這檔事 -- 我跟他說台灣有個很有名的教授最近在批判醫學生上課遲到 睡覺 吃東西 我才講到這邊 他馬上就搶話說 So what? I don't see anything wrong with that. 我說 She claimed they were being unrespectable to professors and lazy in their study. 結果他更激動 What? We pay the school fxxking $40000 a year. Why do I have to go to class on time? Why should I respect the fxxking professors? -- 我自己想到的則不是洪蘭拿高標準批判學生 而是洪蘭如果有種一點應該要批判那些真正 "尸位素餐" 的大學教授 -- 現在這社會好像出張嘴罵罵年輕人就很有話題性 好像很有建設性 憂國憂民 但真正的大問題卻沒人敢碰沒人敢講 ※ 引述《Epsilon (我是EPS)》之銘言: : ※ 引述《xcycl (XOO)》之銘言: : : 這樣的反應會不會太小家子氣,反應出來的作為跟 ptt 大多數冷嘲熱諷的鄉民 : : 從未認真的回文有什麼不同?可以惡搞,可以諷刺,可以幽默以對, : : 但是這些外表之下如果沒有一點內容,這些表現方式不過就更突顯學生的腐儒心態了嗎? : 沒內容? : 他們檢討會的內容請問您看到了嗎? : 要說沒內容,只怕有親身參與該會議的教授不會同意你。 : 媒體當然一直聚焦在他們消遣洪蘭那部份, : 你只看到那部份就說他們沒內容, : 是不是被媒體牽著鼻子走而只看事情的表面? : 我個人認為台大醫科受到洪蘭莫名其妙的攻擊, : 站起來反擊本來就沒什麼不對, : 打不還手罵不還口的時代早就過去了。 : 而他們選擇幽洪蘭幾默,而不是更激烈的言詞對抗, : 也實際請了系內系外的教授來討論,設法改進課程與上課秩序, : 我認為他們做到了他們該做的,一點都沒什麼不當, : 我支持這些學生。 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 130.245.246.247
pukka:Why should I care about the fxxking students? 大家混吧XD 12/16 06:31
lovenainai:cuz studnets pay. lol 12/16 06:34
pbs:Teachers don't need to care about the fxxking students. 12/16 06:50
pbs:Their responsibility is to teach effectively. 12/16 06:50
pukka:They pay for my lectures only, not my respect/concern. 12/16 06:57
pukka:If such a relationship is what they want, let's do it. 12/16 06:59
pukka:I'm pretty sure it's also easier for professors. 12/16 07:00
pukka:I don't even need to let my lectures perfect, cus they 12/16 07:01
pbs:What students expect is well-organized lectures. 12/16 07:01
lovenainai:that's what i heard and not the point in my article 12/16 07:02
pbs:Your respect/concern is unnecessary. 12/16 07:02
lovenainai:and this is not meant to anyone 12/16 07:03
pukka:don't pay me a perfect price. They deserve what they pay 12/16 07:03
pukka:especially for the price in Taiwan. 12/16 07:05
pukka:Want well-organized lectures? Sure, let's talk about the 12/16 07:07
pukka:price at first. Is that the relationship students want? 12/16 07:08
pukka:I'll be really happy if the situation becomes so. lol 12/16 07:09
pbs:To be a businessman or an educator is up to you. There's 12/16 07:24
pbs:nothing wrong for businessmen to ask for a reasonable pay. 12/16 07:25
pukka:No, it's up to what students expect. If they want a 12/16 07:26
pukka:bussiness relationship we can also satisfy them easily. 12/16 07:27
pbs:Ethics for educators at a univ are through self-discipline 12/16 07:28
pbs:regardless of what others do. 12/16 07:28
pukka:Now it sounds students more like so. Let's fine, really. 12/16 07:28
pbs:Your attitude is perfect for a cram school. 12/16 07:29
pukka:Sorry? r u talking about educators? I don't think those 12/16 07:29
pukka:students want an educator. When they talk about ethics, 12/16 07:30
pukka:this word applys to both students and professors. 12/16 07:31
pukka:Now the students want to abolish thier own ethics being 12/16 07:31
pukka:a students and prefer a bussiness relationship, so they 12/16 07:32
pukka:do not have any right to ask for professors' ethics. 12/16 07:32
pukka:Bussiness is bussiness, that's all. 12/16 07:33
pukka:I agree that this attitude is perfect for a cram school. 12/16 07:35
pukka:So, do the NTU students think that NTU is a cram school? 12/16 07:36
pukka:If not, why do they take such attitude? 12/16 07:37
pukka:No top school in the world would not ask for students' 12/16 07:38
pukka:ethics and let the univ become fully bussiness-oriented 12/16 07:39
SakuraWars:For all people who think respect for the teacher is 12/16 07:43
SakuraWars:crap, I think you should read pukka's reply here 12/16 07:43
pukka:, but it seems that it's what the NTU students want. 12/16 07:44
pbs:It's quite interesting that the instructor for the NTU 12/16 07:44
pbs:class did not feel offensive at all. 12/16 07:44
pbs:Why haste in labeling NTU a cram school? 12/16 07:49
SakuraWars:If all your point is going around the specific 12/16 07:51
SakuraWars:professor is not offended, maybe you should think 12/16 07:51
SakuraWars:why the head of the Medical School decided to set 12/16 07:52
SakuraWars:a new law to prohibit students from eating in class 12/16 07:52
Star07:Teacher must EARN the respect of the srudnets. 12/16 07:52
pukka:As said, the students' attitude label themselves, not me 12/16 07:54
Star07:that's pethatic for NTU to flatter the society 12/16 07:55
pukka:Both students and professors must earn respect from each 12/16 07:55
pukka:other. So, for this particular case, the point is that 12/16 07:56
pukka:whether the lecturer of the class deserve students' 12/16 07:56
pukka:respect? If the answer is yes, and the students do not 12/16 07:57
pukka:give respect to the lecturer back, then I will say that 12/16 07:58
pukka:the students should be blamed, and vice versa. 12/16 07:58
Star07:1. who has right to define the respect ? Prof. Hong 12/16 08:00
SakuraWars:The society has the right, so after this discussion 12/16 08:01
SakuraWars:through media, the head of the MS decided to set 12/16 08:01
Star07:or anyone on the web? It's to be discussed by the class 12/16 08:02
SakuraWars:the law. This is not pethatic, but is to tell that 12/16 08:02
SakuraWars:eating in class is not a way to show respect to the 12/16 08:02
SakuraWars:lecturer. Universities have the responsibility to 12/16 08:02
Star07:I think we can stop here. It is quite clear and reveal 12/16 08:03
SakuraWars:educate by showing the correct attitude themselves 12/16 08:03
Star07:the opinion of both sides. 12/16 08:03
single5566:WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TRYING TO SAY, Y'ALL? 12/16 09:22
cuteray:Why in English? XD~ 12/16 10:34
SakuraWars:Ask the people to pushed the 2nd and 3rd line XD 12/16 10:36
SakuraWars: who 12/16 10:36
a94874:我覺得這是文化上的差異 當然吃東西本身並沒有錯 12/16 22:43
a94874:但是我們的文化 儒家思想 尊師重道之類的想法說這樣是不好 12/16 22:45
lovenainai:我也覺得文化有差 我感覺根本在這沒人當成一回事 12/16 22:46
lovenainai:結果大家可以吵成這樣... 12/16 22:46
a94874:我覺得這就是我們跟別人不ㄧ樣的地方 不過近幾年自我意識 12/16 22:46
a94874:抬頭 太過強調自我很容易變成自私 這樣就不好了 12/16 22:47
SakuraWars:就我所知,上課不吃東西在歐洲至少德法是很普遍的 12/16 22:50
SakuraWars:所以不一定跟所謂儒家思想有關 12/16 22:50