It he(she) ate up

Cavenaghi chose the subtle(fine), different definition, " goal in colors ", bef
ore that a simple resolution, in " target and negro ", in two clear situations.
 This way, it(he,she) lost the chance of solving the party(game).

http://old.ole.com.ar/diario/2004/02/16/c-709169.htm

Fernando Cavenaghi always searched, it(he,she) searches and it(he,she) will lo
ok for a different definition. If it(he,she) has the dominated ball and the tho
usandth necessary ones to choose, he(she) will choose for a Vaseline(petroleum
jelly), will point at the angle... It(he,she) Will Prefer traversing the risk a
nd a goal turning into colors, of this that generate pleasure and admiration, b
efore that to do with a puntinazo. Yes, anyone costs(is worth) one. But not for
 him(it). He(she) does not understand it this way. Not yesterday, not today ...
 not tomorrow?

It(He,She) resolved in target and negro when he(she) does not still have other
one: the good combination between(among) Coudet and Juan Fernandez ended with a
 center of the wings that the Torito (that of River, not that of Slaughter hous
es) blended to the net. It(he,she) did not have time to invent a pirouette. It(
he) was effective, since it he must be a scorer...

There are two plays that, in a party(game) of so many tight millstone and so ma
ny raspon against the lawn, mark the difference between(among) winning or to ti
e. River was far from being a machine, though in two assaults it(he,she) could
gain(earn) the party(game). And though Cavenaghi is not the only one responsibl
e for which there were not being obtained all three points (of fact, it(he,she)
 gains(earns) almost them with a free shot that kissed the transom), two times
it(he,she) had in his(its,her) feet the possibility of solving the evening his(
its) equipment(team). But it(he,she) could not with his(its) essence: it(he,she
) chose the toy. And it(he,she) ended fighting the hair, bitting his/her/its li
p, doing stew. Also wondering what had happened(passed) if ...?

They were going 16 minutes of the second time: Juan Fernandez touched for Husai
n, this one punctured the ball and Montenegro combed itself Cavenaghi. The forw
ard stung in diagonal of the way towards the left side, met the bowl mansita, h
im(her) going down, ideally to define with a dry zurdazo to the first stick(woo
d) that the archer had neglected. But it(he,she) defined cacheteandola with the
 external face of the straight booty, seeking to seize the archer to counter le
g, with a pumped shot, directed good but without too much force. Of Olivera the
 ball took hold with his(its,her) two gloves and that of River fought the vinch
a. It was 2-2...

There is another aspect of his(its) game that it is necessary to can interpret:
 his(its) insistence to go out of the zone of fire and to take part of the offe
nsive circuit. When it(he,she) was D " Alessandro, an explosive and vertical ho
oking, Cavenaghi almost that did not have margin of maneuver out of the area, b
ecause it was shocked with his(its) companion who was coming abreast. But if th
e link is Luduena or I Fight, types with more pause and movement, to go down is
 the whole temptation for the Torito. Maybe Gracefull, a cerebral and attentive
 football player to the movements of tops ahead and behind the defenders, is th
e one that better can take advantage of the aptitudes of the forward inside the
 area, representing it with passes in depth and " forcing it " to remain in his
(its) habitat. It is nice that Cavenaghi looks for the beauty: dozens of times
were applauded his(its,her) exquisite definitions in these pages. But what terr
ible scorer would be if it(he,she) was putting her(it) more followed(continued)
 in target and negro...