精華區beta BBSview 關於我們 聯絡資訊
有錯誤請指證,英文不是很好|| BBC改說法了! http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-11775465 Taiwan taekwondo athlete in Asian Games sock sensor row 台灣跆拳道運動員在亞運的足部感應器爭議 A Taiwanese taekwondo competitor at the Asian Games has been disqualified after extra electronic sensors were found in her socks. 因為襪子裡多了幾個感應器的關係,台灣的選手被亞運取消資格 The sensors detect when competitors score points by landing kicks and punches on their opponent's body. 感應器的用途 Additional sensors could make point-scoring easier. 多出來的感應器會讓得分變容易 Yang Shu-chun had been one of the favourites for the gold medal and says she is innocent. A Taiwan official said her disqualification was "unfair". 楊淑君說他是清白的,台灣官方聲稱被取消資格很不公平。 Taiwan's top sports body immediately voiced its concern over the ruling. 台灣體委會很快地對這件判決表達關切。 "The technical committee did not allow Taiwan's team a chance to explain before making the decision and we regret the unfair ruling," said the Sports Affairs Council. 「會議根本不讓台灣團隊有任何解釋機會就直接判決! 我們對這次不公平的判決表示遺憾」 體委會如是說。 The use of such sensors in the fighters' socks was introduced to make judging more transparent. 襪子的用途 Judging controversy 判決的爭議 Yang Shu-chun was leading by 9-0 against her Vietnamese opponent Thi Hau Vu, when the match was halted. 楊淑君把對手九比零之後比賽被中斷, The fight was for a place in the quarter-finals of the under 49kg (108lb) division. 這場比賽是49公斤量級四強賽 Match officials said her footguards carried unauthorised extra electronic sensors behind the heel. 比賽官方聲稱她的襪子,腳跟後面有多出來的感應器 Ms Yang and her coach protested her innocence and both refused to leave the competition area. 楊正妹和她的教練捍衛它們的清白,拒絕離場。 Taiwan officials said the equipment had been previously approved. 台灣官方說裝備已經被驗證過了 "The footwear passed the original pre-match checks but during the match, when she was leading 9-0, the officials decided the footwear was unacceptable," said Taiwan team official Tang Hui-ting. 「足部裝備在檢錄的時候就被檢查過了,但是在九比零的時候,官方居然說 她的襪子是不合格的」台灣隊湯惠婷說。 "This kind of footwear is made by a major company and we have used it before in competition," she said. 「這種襪子是在生產這種襪子的專門公司做的,而且我們之前比賽都用它」她說。 The World Taekwondo Federation defended its decision, saying the extra sensors had been removed from Ms Yang's socks before the match, but had been fixed back on. 世界跆拳道組織捍衛他們的決定,他們說多出來的感應器在上場之前有拿掉, 但是後來又被固定回去了。 It is the first major judging controversy at the Asian Games, which is taking place in the southern Chinese city of Guangzhou. 這是在中國廣州舉辦的亞運首次重大的爭議。 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.113.252.40
victoryss:略懂 11/17 23:54
killverybig:→ victoryss:貼這個 放大頭貼 http://ppt.cc/,vs_ XD 11/17 23:55
Pttntu:下一篇一樓是v開頭 11/17 23:55
eszxc777:很好 下一個 11/17 23:55
suPerFlyK:嗯 11/17 23:55
dlevel:好像沒人提到記者說明會上梁用個人隱私作為理由的。 11/17 23:56
pc2990:大家的努力有點用了 11/17 23:56
※ 編輯: linhomeyeu 來自: 140.113.252.40 (11/17 23:56)
schimtag168:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmA7ZTMZXEs 11/17 23:56
reich3:修改後比之前那篇中立多了~ 11/17 23:57
fv:沒有被裝回去阿...是光頭走當場邊跟教練拿走的阿.. 11/17 23:57
frafoa:台灣加油! 11/17 23:57
wholewing:要跟BBC強調"感應器沒有被裝回去" 11/17 23:57
airlow:固定回去?不是抗議後從教練那邊椅子下拿出來的?以為沒錄影? 11/17 23:57
warm0808:阿共貨惹的貨 11/17 23:57
iam0718:看看某版21077 無動作 他們喊沒膽 有動作 他們喊X民 11/17 23:58
liusim:那兩個下壓根本不需要感應器判定得分 而且對手是0啊! 11/17 23:58
airlow:影片拿給他們看,他們從中止到判決,這段時間都沒拿楊的道 11/17 23:58
ZETA821:酷喔有寄有差 11/17 23:58
oj113068:我今天聽廣播也聽到什麼個人隱私,整個不懂.. 11/17 23:58
liusim:這種判決不扯嗎= =? 對手0分欸~~ 11/17 23:58
push1997:BBC的語意沒有錯~他說的是大會的看法.但沒有台灣的看法. 11/17 23:59
SotaFujimori:何必去在意某版的白痴言論 作你覺得對的事就好 11/17 23:59
airlow:具去檢查,而是拿教練椅子下的去當證據,睜眼說瞎話有裝回? 11/17 23:59
push1997:BBC變成有斷章取義之嫌 11/17 23:59
rave760422:9:0 嚇死那堆吱那豬和含狗了 11/17 23:59
lpiglet:BBC那依段是WTF的說法不是BBC得看法更不表示事實 11/18 00:00
agen:那兩片要也是貼在教練的腳上阿 睜眼說瞎話嗎 11/18 00:00
shibaookenta:楊正妹XD 11/18 00:00
TCFmars:這篇沒錯,他說出WTF講的,就算錯了也是留做存證 11/18 00:01
push1997:BBC這樣可能會誤導..少了兩造對質說法. 11/18 00:01
LeoCha:好多了 11/18 00:01
v1020304:拆下來放椅子下-光頭跟教練拿-耶!!抓到了 有多的 11/18 00:01
airlow:楊從中止比賽後就一直在暖身,根本沒被叫去檢查裝備,到底 11/18 00:01
djcowboy:這篇變成中立報導了 11/18 00:02
airlow:憑啥說他們發現多一片(有一說是位置不對)?幹你獨眼龍喔 11/18 00:02
push1997:一開始就拔了呀~比賽開始~裁判自己先失格~ 11/18 00:02
pita30:不要再一直寄沒用的信了 把影片證據丟給他們 11/18 00:03
pita30:不直寄沒用的信搞不好有人寄有用的信也被一起乎略掉 11/18 00:03
Innes:to airlow: 有那個影片的連結嗎?去拿教練椅子下的 thanx 11/18 00:03
pita30:一 11/18 00:03
airlow:我覺得寄信時要附上影片連結!看過影片不用說啥對方就知道 11/18 00:04
guanghagrid:而且最主要的評分判斷依舊是裁判的眼睛不是嗎? 11/18 00:04
我想BBC已經十分中立了 它說的是 WTF 的看法而不是 BBC 的看法 而WTF那樣說是事實 所以在寄信過去應該也沒有意義~? ※ 編輯: linhomeyeu 來自: 140.113.252.40 (11/18 00:05)
Crazyfire:真的平衡好多了 繼續努力啊!! 11/18 00:04
Crazyfire:丟影片連結更好 11/18 00:04
airlow:這個就很清楚了,時間點根本就是在比賽前拆下來的! 11/18 00:04
Crazyfire:影片他們自然會有專業人員分析的 11/18 00:05
tear150018:Taiwan team!!! 426要出來吠了嗎 11/18 00:05
lisoukou:寄信過去是針對WTF的荒謬言論抗議 11/18 00:06
airlow:不用專業人員,我都看得出來這是赤裸裸的栽贓!! 11/18 00:07
fv:寄信去是要證實what the fuck說謊 11/18 00:07
ghostl40809:WTF我都會直接切換到髒話... 11/18 00:12
Innes:謝謝airlow 11/18 00:13
xxxz:推一個 11/18 00:22