==> aqueous (Words? No more) 提到:
> ==> bluegene (bluegene) 提到:
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> This is SO wrong... protein control is NOT a part of the
> sequencing project. They draft is because sequence is incomplete,
> NOT because they don't know the function. Function is not
> the central part (if it is in the project at all) of the project
> at this point.
> > NO! This is a absolutely wrong answer!
> > This is not what the "draft of human genome" mean.
> > We have so much false information on this board!
> > Please refer to the definition of "draft" from HGP's documents.
> > It is calle "draft" simply because the sequencing of human genome
> > is UNFINISHED! The draft announced recently still contains a lot
> > of PHASE 1 and PHASE 2 sequences. PHASE 1 sequences are sequences
> > with gaps, uncertain order and orientation. PHASE 2 sequences have
> > correct order and orientation but still have gaps.
> As i recalled, it is called draft is because this reason,
> with ~1% of sequence missing (but it is believe that
> most of this 1% do not code for any thing). Also,
> there are two versions of draft completed by Celera and
> HGP with wide consensus believe the Celera version is the
> better version.
> One more comment on gene function and protein control,
> the rise of the disipline of Computational Biology is because
> the determination of protein control and gene function is
> even more hacktive than sequencing that biologists turn
> to Computational biology instread of the traditional
> experimental biology (biochem, MolBio). Thus protein control
> and gene function will be part of the disipline of
> Computational Biology instead of HGP that concentrate
> primarily on the sequence.
可不可以用中文稍微解釋一下以上的說明呢?
對不起英文底子實在不太好,又有太多不知定義的專有名詞,
頗難懂的,這幾天看報紙炒得很火熱,卻沒有記者能完完整整的說清楚
到底什麼是基因圖譜,和基因體計劃的目標又有什麼不一樣,
好像要把大家推向一個理想的生物科技天堂般,
結果對科學界而言,到底有沒有大型的突破呢?
--
☆ [Origin:椰林風情] [From: c57.h061013113.is.net.tw] [Login: **] [Post: **]