精華區beta BridgeClub 關於我們 聯絡資訊
[題目]: jmc 提供 1. IMPs. N-S vul. 4. IMPs. No one vul. S K6 W N E S S 543 W N E S H A 3H P ? H AJ982 1C Dbl ? D AKQ73 D AJ1043 C AJ875 C - 2. IMPs. N-S vul. 5. Matchpts. E-W vul. S AK98 W N E S S K63 W N E S H Q82 2S P 4S P H K10 1S P 2C D J8764 P 4NT P ? D A95 P 2S P ? C A C AK732 3. Matchpts. N-S vul. S Q5 W N E S H Q1095 1D 2S(1) Dbl(2) (1)Weak. D 54 3S P P Dbl(3) (2)Negative. C AQJ63 P 4D P ? (3)Competitive. 解答在下一頁 [解答]: jmc 提供 Directors: Henry Francis, Brent Manley, and Jody Latham. Panel: Marty Bergen, August Boehm, Larry Cohen, Lynn Deas, Sue Picus, Fred Gitelman, Eddie Kantar, Betty Ann Kennedy, Richard Oshlag, Barry Rigal, and Dorothy Truscott. 1. 分數 票數 2. 分數 票數 4. 分數 票數 5H 10 2 5D 10 11 1H 10 13 4NT 9 3 6D 6 3 Redbl 6 1 6H 8 3 1D 1 0 4D 7 1 3. 分數 票數 4H 6 5 Pass 10 13 5. 分數 票數 4C 2 0 4H 3 1 3S 10 11 4S 1 0 5C 1 0 4NT 7 3 後四題的答案都相當明顯, 較具爭議的是第一題. 引述其評論如下: .... Yes, we see that 4H got the most votes. But did it really? Nine panelists decided to explore for slam -- they just chose different ways to seek the slam goal. So it really came down to two choices -- try for slam or settle for game. Clearly try for slam got the call. That's why 4H has been downgraded -- it was the minority bid. The top rating was given to 5H because these bidders based their slam aspiration on the quality of their partner's heart suit. Those who bid 4NT also asked a question -- they planned to base their slam decision on the number of key cards held by partner. 4D also was upgraded because it too was a slam exploratory bid. 6H was rated somewhat lower because it was unilateral decision to bid the slam.......