→ thismy:你檢舉的這推文的第一句 你早在挑釁了 203.82.94.81 04/10 22:28
→ thismy:你連自己挑釁人的推文也貼出來？ 203.82.94.81 04/10 22:29
→ wormchiou:如果你認為多讀佛經是挑釁,請檢舉218.210.124.200 04/10 22:29
→ thismy:加上了嘘 是完全見不到誠意的 具有諷意 203.82.94.81 04/10 22:30
→ wormchiou:我堅信沒有任何人會認為多讀之後再來看218.210.124.200 04/10 22:30
→ wormchiou:會是挑釁,因為不是非黑即白的判斷218.210.124.200 04/10 22:31
→ arblord:奉勸t大多讀點XX後再來看這OO問題<--125.224.191.249 04/10 22:31
→ arblord:怎看都像挑釁125.224.191.249 04/10 22:31
→ thismy:a大你的看法與我不同 但與檢舉無關 203.82.94.81 04/10 22:32
→ thismy:噓 wormchiou:奉勸t大多讀點佛經後再來看這 203.82.94.81 04/10 22:32
→ thismy:這也是挑釁 別說有嘘是誠意`~~ 203.82.94.81 04/10 22:32
→ thismy:沒關係 我相信人多不是真理 板主會判斷 203.82.94.81 04/10 22:33
→ arblord:純路人觀點，請不要理我 XDD125.224.191.249 04/10 22:34
→ wormchiou:如果t認為是,請依板規檢舉處理^_^218.210.124.200 04/10 22:34
→ wormchiou:回您的字句中無出現刻意挑釁字眼218.210.124.200 04/10 22:35
→ thismy:井麼如果T 認為是？ 你在說什麼 203.82.94.81 04/10 22:35
→ thismy:當然是依板主處理 203.82.94.81 04/10 22:35
→ wormchiou:佛經本來就是需要前後看才能通218.210.124.200 04/10 22:35
→ thismy:你那麼擔心幹嘛 我們等板主來就好 203.82.94.81 04/10 22:36
→ wormchiou:我不擔心阿...哈218.210.124.200 04/10 22:36
→ Cid:這是雙方辯論議題中因看法落差而產生的詰問言 61.231.145.208 04/10 23:40
→ Cid:辭, 不宜以板規介入. 61.231.145.208 04/10 23:40
→ wormchiou:版主,雙面人一詞已經是攻擊請上網查清楚218.210.124.200 04/10 23:47
→ wormchiou:該用詞定義218.210.124.200 04/10 23:47
→ wormchiou:如對方認定我論述前後不一,可直接說明218.210.124.200 04/10 23:47
→ wormchiou:前後論點衝突,而非使用雙面人一詞218.210.124.200 04/10 23:48
→ Cid:請問雙面人的定義是? 61.231.145.208 04/11 00:03
→ wormchiou:麻煩板主上yahoo知識家查一下218.210.124.200 04/11 00:05
→ wormchiou:普世對於雙面人定義是表裡不一,惡質的218.210.124.200 04/11 00:06
→ wormchiou:並非是論述中所謂的論點不一致218.210.124.200 04/11 00:06
→ Cid:我以為yahoo知識+的定義並不具普遍的代表性. 61.231.145.208 04/11 00:07
→ wormchiou:雙面人該辭是攻擊行為,非表明論點不同218.210.124.200 04/11 00:07
→ wormchiou:也可至google查詢該辭218.210.124.200 04/11 00:08
→ Cid:請問w大, 如果您連我都無法說服認同雙面人是攻 61.231.145.208 04/11 00:10
→ Cid:擊用詞, 這不是正說明了雙面人一詞的定義不具 61.231.145.208 04/11 00:11
→ Cid:普遍性? 61.231.145.208 04/11 00:11
→ wormchiou:普世價值觀,如果剛好C大是少數那群218.210.124.200 04/11 00:13
→ wormchiou:那當然無法理解為何yahoo與oogle對該辭218.210.124.200 04/11 00:13
→ wormchiou:能查詢到的幾乎都是負面定義218.210.124.200 04/11 00:13
→ wormchiou:那我也該跟板大請教,論點前後不一使用218.210.124.200 04/11 00:14
→ wormchiou:雙面人一詞來回應對嗎??還請板大告知218.210.124.200 04/11 00:14
→ wormchiou:避免我要是說某板友在佛教板前後不一218.210.124.200 04/11 00:15
→ wormchiou:真是雙面人,遭人誤會,起碼可以說這是cid218.210.124.200 04/11 00:15
→ wormchiou:認定在佛教板說板友雙面人=不是攻擊218.210.124.200 04/11 00:15
→ Cid:google/yahoo的搜尋結果從來就不被認可為學校 61.231.145.208 04/11 00:17
→ Cid:報告中reference的引述內容, 這正是為何我不認 61.231.145.208 04/11 00:17
→ Cid:同您對雙面人的解釋具有普遍性的原因. 61.231.145.208 04/11 00:18
→ Cid:雙面人是否為攻擊用字, 也需要看上下文的文意, 61.231.145.208 04/11 00:18
→ freeunixer:如果心理素質不夠堅強,還是遠離佛板啊~ 60.250.90.238 04/11 00:18
→ Cid:從thismy板友的上下文來看, 這只是要詰問您立 61.231.145.208 04/11 00:19
→ Cid:場前後不一的譬喻詞, 是否引喻失當並不宜以板 61.231.145.208 04/11 00:19
→ Cid:規介入. 61.231.145.208 04/11 00:19
→ wormchiou:f大大,人是在錯誤中學習成長218.210.124.200 04/11 00:21
→ wormchiou:但不能惡意攻擊他人,對吧218.210.124.200 04/11 00:21
→ wormchiou:我很樂於討論,但不能因此就接受惡意挑釁218.210.124.200 04/11 00:22
→ wormchiou:板大,對方是如您所言引喻失當218.210.124.200 04/11 00:23
→ wormchiou:但用詞也太過不恰當218.210.124.200 04/11 00:23
→ wormchiou:如板大認為實在不需要板規介入我也接受218.210.124.200 04/11 00:24
→ freeunixer:藏密被攻擊時,攻擊方經常引喻失當啊~~ 60.250.90.238 04/11 00:26
→ freeunixer:~攤手~ 60.250.90.238 04/11 00:26
→ wormchiou:~攤手~=___=218.210.124.200 04/11 00:28
→ Cid:這邊採用的標準是, 因為雙面人並非普遍被認定 61.231.145.208 04/11 00:33
→ Cid:為不當攻擊用法的詞彙, 因此不予處置. 61.231.145.208 04/11 00:34