精華區beta C_Chat 關於我們 聯絡資訊
そういえば私も魔法について気になってることがあったので、絵を描いたんですけど、 伝わりますかね? 魔法を飛ばす力が強ければ強いほど、反対向きに働く力も強くなるんじゃないかと思っ て。 https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GK2VaAVbsAAZy2c.jpg
https://x.com/akstif9eS583458/status/1778242678670647536 作者認為 施展魔法的力量越強,反作用的力量就越強 然後底下就一票亂七八糟的討論了 有人說 魔法是沒有物理效果的 https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GK3VQ-saUAAZqiF.jpg
如果火球有推進力的話 https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GK3ipO_awAAtXns.jpg
像這樣 梅林(力量B) https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DO2n08ZVwAAkHVI.jpg
蠻有趣的想法 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.242.105.77 (臺灣) ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1712851373.A.119.html ※ 編輯: w790818 (111.242.105.77 臺灣), 04/12/2024 00:04:12
Mareeta: 能量是等價交換 04/12 00:03
rabbithouse: 反作用力也被打出去了 04/12 00:10
Dsfsddf: 火只是一團能量要怎麼施加作用力 04/12 00:21
goddio: 火焰通常是氣體和電漿的組合 當然有質量有作用力 04/12 02:56
peterisme17: 反作用力用魔法消掉不就好了 04/12 08:33
Pietro: 迷霧之子 04/12 09:38
jiko5566: 都能無中生有了,還擔心反作用力? 04/12 09:45
jiko5566: 這種就作者說的算 04/12 09:45
Acoustics: i think avoiding the necessity of newton's third la 04/12 12:22
Acoustics: w for the forces themselves is the first considerat 04/12 12:23
Acoustics: ion 04/12 12:23
Acoustics: basically we can believe magic should lean more tow 04/12 12:24
Acoustics: ards programming eg "time complexity (for execution 04/12 12:32
Acoustics: ) = x (log m)" would suffice 04/12 12:33
Acoustics: 2. newton's third law becomes problematuc in the pr 04/12 12:33
Acoustics: oblematuc in the pressence of significant relativis 04/12 12:35
Acoustics: tic effects, eg magnetism observed in daily life 04/12 12:35
Acoustics: 3. settings could also incorporate concepts from bo 04/12 12:36
Acoustics: sons and fermions 04/12 12:37
Acoustics: where particles can overlap in bosonic states but a 04/12 12:38
Acoustics: dhere to the pauli exclusion principle in fermionic 04/12 12:38
Acoustics: statees 04/12 12:39
Acoustics: eg could be depicted as "even pairs of fermions beh 04/12 12:39
Acoustics: aving akin to bosons" resembling a superconductor 04/12 12:46
Acoustics: devoid of friction 04/12 12:46
Acoustics: ^ almost as if it were magic 04/12 12:46