[閒聊] Adobe是不是有機會解決AI/人力繪圖紛爭？

[arrenwu (不是綿芽的錯)]

這是今天的兩篇Adobe Blog文章

Bringing the next wave of Artificial Intelligence to Creative Cloud
Link: https://adobe.ly/3yT6xUm (Adobe Blog)

裡面提到

Adobe, along with many other innovators, has been experimenting with
Generative AI. It is a transformational technology, one that will accelerate
the ways artists brainstorm and explore creative avenues — and make
creativity accessible to millions more people

Adobe 肯定 Generative AI 科技在腦力激盪以及提供更多人創造力上的價值

At the same time, like a lot of new technologies, Generative AI has raised
valid concerns. Among the questions: How is the work of creative people being
used to train the AI models? And how will we know whether something we see
was created by a human or a computer?

但同時，Adobe也指出，Generative AI 有 "valid concerns"，尤其是：
        那些被用來訓練AI Model的人的功勞怎麼算？
        我們要怎麼知道這是人類創作的還是電腦創作的？


Adobe提出的方案是由他們主導的開原標準 Content Authenticity Initiative(CAI)

這邊我又去參考另外一篇我覺得寫得比較好懂的文章
Major steps forward for the CAI
Link: https://adobe.ly/3yT6TdE (Adobe Blog)

在 CAI + Generative technology 那節寫道

In the last year, Generative AI has broken through as a creative technology
for content generation that can take ideation, exploration, and speed to new
levels, aiding and accelerating the creative process. While Generative AI is
an exciting technology with incredible potential, early iterations have
presented valid creative concerns. As Generative AI capabilities become more
widely available, the CAI can give creators a way to prove that their work
was human-made and not from AI only. Building on our commitment to increase
trust and transparency online, today we unveiled our approach to developing
creator-centric Generative AI offerings by incorporating CAI technology into
our tools to support creatives’ ability to prove attribution and by
investing in new research to support creatives’ control over their style and
work.

去年，Generative AI 有重大突破，可以讓大幅加快產生創作內容的速度
雖然這是令人興奮的技術，但也產生了 valid creative concerns
隨著Generative AI越來越普及，CAI 可以讓創作者有個途徑來證明他們的作品
是人類製作而非僅僅使用AI。

基於我們增加網路信任與透明化的承諾，我們今天接露發展以創作者為中心的Generative
AI 產品的方法─整合CAI於我們的工具中、使創作者們可以加入 attribution。
同時也投入新的研究來支援創作者們對其風格與作品的控制


雖然我也不知道確切作起來是什麼樣子，但Adobe講這些話，
看起來好像有機會解決最近的AI/繪師紛亂？

--
禍從口出的蘿莉控
https://i.imgur.com/xOmrB10.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/lZ3FqGM.jpg

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 165.225.243.22 (美國)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1666160667.A.622.html
→ gfabbh: 這不是要給AI訓練師們作品認證嗎？
→ Irenicus: 這樣是以後用AI畫圖還要列reference的意思嗎 XD
推 diabolica: 要自動致謝
→ gungriffon: 電繪不少方便的功能其實也是丟給電腦去算的
推 zyxx: 感覺不太實際
推 leo125160909: 私人架設的還是能繞過吧
推 kinghtt: 這是讓繪師證明這張圖是自己畫的意思？
看起來很像是這樣
※ 編輯: arrenwu (165.225.243.22 美國), 10/19/2022 15:22:58
推 rey123123: 重點是CAI是啥技術
推 yukari8: 查了一下 看起來是在檔案中放個很難竄改的驗證資訊寫是誰
→ yukari8: 弄這張圖等等的資料 不過有看到其實很容易把整個資訊移除
推 twosheep0603: PS已經有很多AI技術啦 那個內容感知填滿跟鬼一樣
→ yukari8: 防君子不防小人吧
推 senas: 用ADOBE以外的AI不就好了
推 kashiwa27: ADOBE早在35年前就開發出AI了
推 guogu: 寫在檔案資訊不就等於沒用 至少要是肉眼不可視浮水印吧
推 Vulpix: ADOBE ILLUSTRATOR (X)
推 nedetdo: 以後電子檔交作業都要留圖層嗎