精華區beta Celtics 關於我們 聯絡資訊
Charting Out NBA Archetypes Written by Rob Mahoney Wednesday, 17 December 2008 11:13 http://0rz.tw/f35bq 這是名叫Rob Mahoney的人士做出的NBA球員等級分類 按照他的說法,球員大致可以分成五個等級。 值得注意的是在此人的模型裡,根據每位球員的優缺點及球風屬性不同,該球員可能同時 落在不同的層次。 ---------------------------- 圖一:http://0rz.tw/3f5fh 圖二:http://0rz.tw/675dU 圖三:http://0rz.tw/6b5gm 茲節錄部份內容如下,欲知全文詳情請至原作者連結。 ^^^^^^^^ ◎ 最高層次 Elite Point Guard *Dreamy eyes *A threat to score from all over *Mad sick handles, yo *Expert in preventative or gambling defense (preferably both) *Establishes teammates without hindering his own opportunities 代表:Chris Paul Refined Big Man *They're kind of tall *Frighteningly dominant *Leadership by nature, play, or attitude *Defensive prowess in the form of fundamental focus, unbridled athleticism, or getting down on all fours and barking 代表:Kevin Garnett ◎ 次高層次 Pass-first Point 代表:Steve Nash Surreal Scorer 代表:Dwyane Wade Renissance Man ※此分類原作者的定義如下: Dabbles, and succeeds, in doing practically everything. They can handle the rock, set up their teammates, rebound well for their position, and score at will. 代表:Paul Pierce ◎ 第三層次 Pure shooter 代表:Michael Redd Salad bar ※此分類作者的定義如下: I wish I could claim this term as my own, but it belongs to Matt Moore. Matt's explanation: "A little bit of everything that never leaves you full. But, too much can be a bad thing." 代表:Shawn Marion (Salad bar感覺很接近Renissance Man的定義,屬性分野也許不大,層次差距卻頗大) Mortal Scorer 代表:Richard Hamilton Skilled,but flawed post 代表:Pau Gasol Scoring 'combo Guard' 代表:Jason Terry offensive-minded pivot 代表:Al Jefferson stat-stuffer 代表:Gerald Wallace interior defensive presence 代表:Marcus Camby Three-Point bomber 代表:Peja Stojakovic Rising star 代表:? (眼拙,認不出照片是誰) (以上若有球員誤植人名的情況,還請強人指證.....) ◎ 其他分類 Locker room chemist - Traditional "locker room" guy. Coach in a uni, motivates the team, and keeps the young'ins in line. Ring bearer - Functionally the same as a locker room chemist, but has the invaluable "championship experience" to validate him. (應該是指James Posey和Robert Horry此類型的球員) ◎ 關於KOBE 原作者如以下表示: Take Kobe, for example: I would classify Kobes as primary: Surreal scorer, secondary: Renaissance man. So what does that say about Kobe's placement on this type of hierarchy? It says that in terms of value based on classification alone, Kobe would be among the second tier of players. This brings about the point that as a general rule, sheer talent could push a player up one tier, or maybe even two. 關於LBJ 原作者如以下表示: The first question that probably comes to mind is: why is LeBron James all by his lonesome? To be honest, it's because the man has no true classification. Are his incredible scoring instincts primary? Or maybe his surreal ability to find his teammates open shots? Or is it the size and skill that allows him to physically dominate any defender that stands in front of him? Or maybe he's just LeBron James. Similar, but lesser variations of unclassifiable players exist in Diaw and Harrington, but their place on the hierarchy is a bit more mortal. (嗯......LBJ因為太強大、太難界定,所以只好獨立自成一國....囧) ------------------------------------------------ 基本上,每個人對於球員各有一套分類表準 不過這位作者的分類法私以為還算中肯齊全 有興趣的鄉民們可以到原作者的網頁去瞧瞧 然後還是不要問我RAY在哪裡...... 原作者倒是把A.Walker歸類成chucker 至於馬大少......囧 # -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 220.136.83.105
fk920 :Ray咧!!!!!!!有Redd跟Peja不反對....那Ray咧!!!!!!!! 12/23 21:33
gaiaesque :rising star 是monta 12/23 21:41
zymewwjd :剛好RA也不想只被當做是純射手XD take it easy~ 12/23 21:43
gaiaesque :ray 應該叫做killer !!!!!!!!!!! 12/23 21:44
AngeLucifer :甚麼純射手, 太浪費了吧XD 12/23 23:52
jamesch :Ray應該屬於Combo scoring 3-point shooter XD 12/24 00:12
qwer1234 :愛麗絲 12/24 00:32
a031860318:轉錄至看板 NBA 12/24 00:39
a031860318 :抱歉忘了推 借轉 12/24 00:40