推 jftsai:也許真的也和這個差不了多少....我猜~~ 12/01 01:37
推 DemonRing:@@a 12/01 01:49
推 Okuthor:難辨真假，不過真的確實差不多就這樣，仔細研究才看得出來 12/01 02:45
→ Okuthor:吧？之前Fio教練Prandelli的戰術也放了一篇pdf出來過，格 12/01 02:45
→ Okuthor:式相近，只是這種東西，沒事怎麼會漏出來啊．．． 12/01 02:46
→ Okuthor:個人覺得這是好東西，不載可惜，如果是真的，一輩子看不到 12/01 02:47
→ Okuthor:幾次的，再多新聞、評論、專訪，都不會有這個詳細。 12/01 02:47
推 JamesCaesar:有內鬼！ 12/01 02:53
推 wadissimo:我覺得很有可能是真的,Fio版那個是一般教練班球評的看法 12/01 13:26
→ wadissimo:但這篇報告太詳細了,尤其是綠字,全都是講對應的方法,不 12/01 13:27
→ wadissimo:敢講這是助理寫給穆帥的分析,也有可能是外面高級教練班 12/01 13:28
→ wadissimo:的教材,其實我覺得Boumsong的確是這分析裡面講的缺點 12/01 13:28
推 JamesCaesar:4914 12/01 17:17
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- <
作者: jftsai (老臭蟲沒拿社區盾) 看板: Chelsea
標題: Re: [情報] 有趣的東西外流？
時間: Fri Dec 2 15:46:28 2005
http://www.sportinglife.com/football/news/story_get.cgi?STORY_NAME=soccer/05/
12/02/SOCCER_Chelsea_Dossier.html&TEAMHD=soccer
NO CHELSEA PROBE INTO LEAK (選錄)
Chelsea have decided not to launch an internal investigation into how one of
Jose Mourinho's famous pre-match dossiers ended up on the internet.
(切爾西不會進行內部調查重要文件外流一事。)
The club are mystified as to how the detailed five-page tactical assessment
for their home match with Newcastle last month managed to find its way into
the public domain.
But they will not be conducting a witch hunt to identify the source of the
leak and, although the club are refusing to comment on the report's
authenticity, it appears to be a remarkable example of Mourinho's well
researched pre-match dossiers.
(儘管如此，切爾西也拒絕對此文件的真實性做進一步評論。)
Some elements are understood to have been altered by the recipient but the
front cover of the document is allegedly in an identical format to that used
by the Portuguese coach for all his briefings.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 59.121.186.152