※ 引述《stayinalive (當代對話 百年論述)》之銘言：
: 算了吧,什麼跆盟的懲戒委員會還不就是南韓人關門自爽
: 愛怎麼判就怎麼判,早不是新鮮事
: 拿這來說嘴,根本搞不清狀況
: 人家亞奧會都認定跆盟的判決可議
亞奧會暗指楊淑君作弊？ 稱停賽很公平
http://www.nownews.com/2010/11/27/341-2668460.htm
你說的是這則新聞嗎? 看起來與你說的不像呀 !!
還是連亞奧會都被韓國人關門自爽了 ??
: 歐美各大媒體都評價這件事是奇怪的判決
不對耶 ! 我怎麼看歐美各大媒體的報導都是以世跆盟說法為主 ??
也許是因歐美媒體比較負責, 報導前都有參詳過跆拳道規則吧....
Before each round of competition, the referee shall check whether
any attempts were made to manipulate the scoring system and/or
increase sensitivity of the sensing socks, or any other method, by
the athlete. In the event that the referee finds intentional
manipulation, the referee shall reserve the right to give “Gam-jeom”
to the pertinent contestant and shall reserve the right to declare
the violating athlete as the loser by penalty based on the degree of
seriousness of the violation.
你知道跆拳規則中為何特別強調"Before each round of competition" 嗎 ?
還是你根本不知道有這個規則 ??
: 南韓的跆盟要怎麼自爽的懲戒都請便
: 我真的給你個良心建議
: 這話題你還是別討論為妙
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 218.173.162.49