→ hitsukix:沒關係 反正給我用都一樣拍不好XD 09/18 01:03
推 uwmtsa:是啊 不過他的說法對D700的畫質應該沒貶意 只是強調5d優點 09/18 01:04
推 volcom:是啊 我連小片幅相機都拍不好了 買FF只是多花錢而已 09/18 01:19
推 dvdr2001:看了5D2跟A900規格後感覺Nikon D700的對焦系統真是有誠意 09/18 01:43
推 Amplifiers:有誠意就不是Canon了 顆顆 09/18 02:08
※ 引述《uwmtsa (Cha)》之銘言：
: 我越俎代庖一下,"猜"您是要引用這篇文章的內容
: http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d3-d700-5d.htm
: 也"猜"一下您可能是想引這句:(我是用那紅色的關鍵字去猜的~~)
: "Now that the D700 is out, it replaces the D3 for just about everything except
: full-time sports, action and news photographers. "
: 作者也確實有說三台裡面5D最利(sharp),但是他上面那句不是拿5D來比
: 是把D700跟D3比,也許c大印象中去重疊了
如果長期有在看 Ken Rockwell 網頁的就知道
其實 Ken 不止一次提過 5D 的畫質比 D3 更好
在 D700 還沒出來前就有了
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/2008-05-new.htm
The Nikon D3 is a wonderful camera, but it's a professional news,
sports, kids and action camera. You're paying two or three times
the price of a 5D for speed and professional toughness, not image
quality.
而在上面那篇 D3-D700-5D 的比較裡面
Ken 也是這樣寫到
The Canon 5D excels in image quality. It's also the lightest and
least expensive of these cameras. It has the sharpest pictures of
these three cameras by a slight margin. If you're backpacking or
shooting careful landscapes, the 5D could give superior image quality
above anything from Nikon, at a bargain price.
Canon 敢死皮賴臉地讓 5D 賣三年不是沒有原因的
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.161.190.25