推 xmas0083 :推翻譯，不過我是C家人XD 10/01 05:13
推 Amitabha :感覺跟1000D好像XD 10/01 10:23
→ kmom :已經先買了>< 學習中..... 10/14 08:58
推 carb628 :這台真有這不堪嗎 有沒有優點或用過的經驗分享一下？ 10/15 00:00
推 KRaikkonen :01有文，應該沒這麼不堪，看用什麼角度去看吧 10/15 23:09
http://kenrockwell.com/nikon/d3000.htm
Ken Rockwell原本對D40讚譽有加,定位跟它非常接近的D3000,理論上也合他口味才是
先前D3000發表後,單看規格也寫說是不錯的機子,只不過實機測試後,看法完全180度大轉變
列舉一些Ken Rockwell的意見:
The D3000 is the worst DSLR ever made by Nikon, which says a lot since
Nikon's been making them for over ten years.
Not that it's that horrible on an absolute scale, but with every other Nikon,
even the older and cheaper D40, being so much better to the experienced user,
it becomes obvious that the D3000 is Nikon's worst DSLR — ever.
The Nikon D40 is a better camera for less money.
如果從古到今來看,D3000算是一台Nikon最失敗的DSLR產品,
比它老3年也更便宜的D40,表現反而比D3000還要好
ADR actually works, and really does improve the look of most photos. its too
bad that it works so slow in the D3000 that it only will work for still
subjects; forget it for action and people pictures.
The problem with taking three seconds to process each frame is that it now
takes at least three seconds for your picture to pop up on the LCD after you
snapped it. Three seconds! I feel so retarded standing around for three
seconds waiting for an image to pop up on the LCD. TIme it yourself; three
seconds feels like three minutes when you're actively shooting.
雖然ADR的效果不錯,但機內處理速度很慢,拍靜態的東西還好,動態就有點不適合了
自按下快門後,要等待3秒才能在LCD螢幕上看到照片
The D3000 is the first Nikon DSLR to have caught the Curse of Canon: you need
to press the PLAY button to get full control of your images while under
review after having just shot them!
If a review image pops up, to get to the other images, you have to press the
left-right controller. The dial won't work, unless you've hit PLAY first.
看照片的操作模式改變,當你剛拍完照,圖片從LCD螢幕顯示出來時
你沒辦法按左右鍵來選擇其他圖片,必須要按PLAY進到觀看模式中,
才有辦法作更多動作,比D40麻煩一點
The D3000's meter is great. It is more accurate more often than the D40 or
D80, whose meters often overexposed.
測光很準,不像D40與D80有常常過曝的情形
The LCD is great - if today was 2005.
Sadly, it is not the sharp, fluid, brilliant 3" LCD of the D90, D300, D700
and D3.
The D3000 LCD has only one-fourth as many pixels as the other Nikon 3" LCDs,
so each pixel is so big that you just about can see them. The LCD looks
coarse compared to the other Nikons.
The D40 has the same number of pixels, but in a smaller 2.5" "screen where it
doesn't look so coarse.
3吋的LCD螢幕雖大,尺寸跟D90以上的機種相同,但是畫素數只有它們的四分之一
讓液晶畫面看起來非常粗糙,D40螢幕擁有相同的畫素,但是尺寸小一點,看起來不那麼粗
High ISOs are poor, compared to other DSLRs. (High ISOs are great compared to
pocket cameras.)
The D40 is twice as good, meaning that the D40 looks as good at ISO 1,600 as
the D3000 looks at ISO 800.
The fastest speed at which the D3000 gives decent results is ISO 800. At ISO
1,600, normal people are going to notice the noise and wonder why the photo
is so grainy.
高ISO效果不佳,甚至比D40低了整整一級,D40在ISO 1600的情況下,跟D3000 ISO800差不多
ken rockwell認為D3000的可用ISO在800以下,再上去就太超過了
http://kenrockwell.com/nikon/d3000/high-iso-comparison.htm
The D3000 still has this problem, if you care. There is no automatic
correction in the D3000, so some lenses will show this slight artifact.
即使Nikon目前新推出的DSLR,都有自動修正鏡頭紫邊功能,但D3000卻是例外
原文沒有直接把D3000拿去跟D60 D80做高ISO的對比,這3台都是用ICX493AQA這顆10M的CCD
否則就理論上來說,因為電子技術逐漸進步,對特定感光元件的特性越來越熟,
最佳化程度也越高,採用同一顆CCD的機器,越晚期的型號應該高ISO表現越好才是
就如同D100 D70 D50 D40都是同一顆CCD,但是最早期的D100,高ISO可用性極為不佳
最晚期的D40,表現能贏過D70與D50這些機器等等
該不會Nikon真的想大幅costdown,設計一款D3000的新機,CCD的調校與最佳化的功夫都免了
如果高ISO還比D80這台最早期的機器還要差,我看D3000真的沒啥吸引力,
雖然主要規格比起來都跟D80差不多,但是少了機身馬達這個致命缺點,也難怪D80這麼保值
除此之外,D3000沒有定義一個明確的消費者族群:
到底是沒接觸過單眼的新手? 還是對單眼熟悉,只想找基本機器的人? D40或DC的升級者?
新加入的引導模式,只對(操作)新手有用,當你熟悉這台相機操作之後,可能不會再去用它了
直接用PASM或其他自動模式,都比引導模式按半天還要快
若客群是沒接觸過單眼的新手,我看加入Live view,都比對焦點升級或引導功能來得實用
D3000如果賣不好,機身不變但換D90那顆CMOS,Nikon D4000要出來救援了嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 219.84.132.86
※ 編輯: oijkue 來自: 219.84.132.86 (10/01 04:32)