Re: Re: Re: 希望台灣的裁判再去進修好嗎？
作者:alexkuo1770 / null發表:2005-03-22 14:15
所學有限，還請專家多多指導
依據FIBA最新版之解釋
Art. 36 Unsportsmanlike foul
36.1 Definition
36.1.1
An unsportsmanlike foul is a player contact foul which, in the judgement of the
official, isnot a legitimate attempt to directly play the ball within the
spirit and intent of the rules.
36.1.2
Unsportsmanlike fouls must be interpreted consistently throughout the whole
game.
36.1.3
The official must judge only the action.
36.1.4
To judge whether a foul is unsportsmanlike, the officials should apply the
followingprinciples:
• If a player is making no effort to play the ball and contact occurs,
it is anunsportsmanlike foul.
• If a player, in an effort to play the ball, causes excessive contact
(hard foul), then thecontact shall be judged to be unsportsmanlike.
• If a player commits a foul while making a legitimate effort to play the
ball (normal play),it is not an unsportsmanlike foul.
個人認為當天達欣被吹判違反運動精神的那幾球
其實真的稱不上excessive contact (hard foul)
視為normal play較合理
且張智峰快攻上籃被毀掉之類似情況並未吹判違反運動精神
也明顯違背36.1.2
本人非達欣球迷
只覺得台灣裁判執法心態的確有諸多可議之處
轉錄自蕃薯藤討論區
http://board.yam.com/hogwarts/lifeleisure/sport/basketball/basketballboard/Forum_view?articleId=6935229
--
雨```````````````````````````````````````````````````
``````` 和``````````````````````````````````````````
````````````````眼淚`````````````````````````````````
````````````````````````````拼命````````````````````
`````````````````````````````````````落下````````````
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.130.181.1