※ 引述《PeerGynt (皮爾金特)》之銘言：
: ※ 引述《Irence (瑜珈男孩)》之銘言：
: : 請問台灣辦的樂透彩(公益彩卷)
: : 會不會加大貧富差距呢?
: ^^^^^^^^^^^^
: Please think more clearly: Does the rich
: get the prize necessarily?
: : 它好像創造了不少富翁,
: : 等於是大家出錢給得主似的
: : 請大家多多指教 謝謝
→ Brahman:窮人比較有動機去買彩券 推 81.131.122.229 07/13
→ PeerGynt:And? 推 61.223.220.246 07/13
→ Brahman:Consider whether lottery is fair game. 推 81.131.111.199 07/14
→ PeerGynt:Or consider more about the allocation? 推 61.223.220.246 07/14
→ Brahman:Allocation of what? utility? wealth? 推143.167.137.220 07/14
→ PeerGynt:prize 推 61.223.220.246 07/14
→ Brahman:What is the allocation of prizes? 推143.167.137.220 07/14
→ PeerGynt:I'm sure not trasferring to the rich.. 推 61.223.220.246 07/14
→ PeerGynt:necessarily. 推 61.223.220.246 07/14
So we can assume that the probabilities of winning (losing) lotteries within
members of the society are equal, that is, the poors and the riches play the
game fairly. Is that what you mean? I think inequity of wealth distribution in
the lottery matter is not resulted from the difference of probabilities to be
a winner between the poor and the rich. There exists another reason.
"Fair game" doesn't mean that the poors and the riches have the same
probability to be a winner. It means the expected benefit of gambling is zero.
Lottery is not a fair gamble because of the negative expected benefit since
some money have to be paid for services of the lottery company and agencies.
If the poors tend to purchase lotteries than do the riches, on average they
will lose more. This is a possible outcome of lottery leading to deterioration
of the inequity of wealth distribution.
If the price of lottery is not affordable for the poors, it will be another
story.
--
達摩西來一字無 只憑心意用功夫
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.csie.ntu.edu.tw)
◆ From: 81.131.176.33
※ 編輯: Brahman 來自: 81.131.176.33 (07/15 04:37)
※ 編輯: Brahman 來自: 81.131.176.33 (07/15 04:44)