推 hunggg:沒看到台灣的廠商阿 去年宏碁不是還有拿到5,7分... 03/23 18:15
推 BarkingSin:任天堂Wii的CPU是台灣代工… 03/24 08:15
→ BarkingSin:我記得Nokia手機很耐操，真正的企業表現不一定就如同 03/24 08:16
→ BarkingSin:這個組織評估的排名吧 03/24 08:17
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- <
作者: Waitingchen (Rejoyce ) 看板: Ecophilia
標題: Re: 綠色電子產品排行：任天堂墊底 三星東芝列第一
時間: Mon Mar 24 08:45:08 2008
補充一下，綠色和平的完整報告網址：
http://www.greenpeace.org/international/campaigns/toxics/electronics/
how-the-companies-line-up
（縮址：http://tinyurl.com/cc4j9）
我自己是覺得這份報告做的很用心，
網頁上有每個廠牌的單獨報告，從圖表可以很清楚看到分數是怎麼來的
（不過要先花點時間看說明就是了）
另一個重要的資訊是每次報告排名的變化，
如果一直穩定往前，
那該企業想要走環保路線的企圖就比較明顯。
18個廠牌的分數排序是
7.7 Samsung - Scores well on toxic chemicals policy.
Loses points for incomplete takeback practice.
7.7 Toshiba - Continued improvement, especially on e-waste and
recycling policy.
7.3 Nokia - Strong on toxic chemicals elimination but penalty
point for deficiencies in takeback practice remains.
7.3 Sony - More products free of toxic PVC and improved reporting
on recycling and takeback especially in the US.
7.3 Dell - Unchanged since the last version, still no products on
the market without the worst chemicals.
7.3 Lenovo - Unchanged since the last version, still no products
on the market without the worst chemicals.
6.7 Sony Ericsson - Drops 6 places due to losing points on its
e-waste policy and practice.
6.7 LGE -Dropping 2 places, loses point on recycling reporting.
6.7 Apple - Steady rise, new models reducing the use of toxic
chemicals, takeback programme still needs to be global.
6.7 Fujitsu-Siemens - Dropping down, needs toxic elimination timelines
and better reporting of amounts recycled.
6.7 HP - Timeline for eliminating worst toxic chemicals, though not for
all products; needs to improve takeback coverage.
6.3 Motorola - Penalty point for poor takeback practice lifted.
Still no timeline for eliminating the most toxic chemicals.
5.7 Acer - Dropping down. Still no products on the market without
the worst chemicals and needs better takeback coverage
and reporting of amounts recycled.
5 Sharp - Some plus points on toxic chemicals elimination and
slight improvement on takeback policy and practice.
4.7 Panasonic - New to the guide - some plus points on toxic chemicals
elimination but poor takeback policy and practice.
4.7 Microsoft -Improved timeline for toxic chemicals elimination (2010)
but poor takeback policy and practice.
4.3 Philips - Improved toxic chemicals elimination deadline but zero
points on e-waste recycling.
0.3 Nintendo - Tiny improvement but still way behind.
---
反正前五名大概都可說是環保品牌，
最後那幾個不到五分的就請避免購買，
特別是任天堂....不到一分是怎樣.....Orz
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 69.234.149.150
→ freeunixer:台灣的 ASUS 連上榜都沒有 XD 03/24 09:17
推 BarkingSin:其實我覺得環不環保和耐用性真的有關係…←也看使用者 03/24 09:18
→ BarkingSin:假如一個產品好用/耐用到很久都不想/不用換 03/24 09:20
→ BarkingSin:其實最後的環境負擔不見得是對廠商的評比可以看出來的 03/24 09:20
→ BarkingSin:當然還是對任天堂的分數很orz…Wii…(遠目) 03/24 09:22
→ Waitingchen:耐用性有算在評分裡面呀，另外還有毒物、回收等 03/24 12:19
推 hunggg:Sony分數比上次進步很多 03/24 12:51