作者tracasserie (tracasserie)
看板Eng-Class
標題[文法] be to V
時間Mon Aug 8 20:20:59 2005
If China were to contemplate a revaluation,
it should consider as an alternative the imposition of a tax on its exports.
想請問這were to contemplate的用法
跟直接用contemplated有什麼不一樣呢
謝謝
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 218.34.173.93
推 coolon:were to 是指絕不會去做140.112.107.220 08/09
推 Adlay:be to V指表未來的安排、計畫 61.58.185.87 08/09
→ Adlay:一定會做的事.... 61.58.185.87 08/09
→ Adlay:只是在假設語氣中就正好給他反過來...一定不會發生 61.58.185.87 08/09
推 Adlay:也就是與未來相反的假設..... 61.58.185.87 08/09
推 tracasserie:非常感謝^^ 218.34.173.93 08/09