[情報] 車手觀點：Hamilton的判罰與其過失程度不符

[shdai (shdai)]

Drivers: Hamilton penalty didn't fit crime

車手觀點：Hamilton的判罰與其過失程度不符



消息來源：
http://www.itv-f1.com/news_article.aspx?id=43902

Several of Lewis Hamilton's fellow drivers believe the Briton did gain a
clear advantage by cutting a chicane at last week’s Belgian Grand Prix,
although they agree that his demotion to third place was too severe.

幾位現役的F1車手認為Ham在Spa確實從切西瓜當中得益，不過他們也認為賽會的判罰過重
。

With the controversy over the stewards’ decision to strip Hamilton of race
victory still raging as the season moves onto Monza, the drivers appearing in
Thursday’s press conference were naturally asked about their views on the
incident.

周四在Monza召開的車手記者會中，幾位車手被問到他們對於判罰事件的觀感。

Toro Rosso’s Sebastien Bourdais reckons the retrospective time penalty
imposed on the McLaren driver was harsh, but nevertheless believes stewards
were correct to issue some sort of punishment.

眼鏡哥認為，這個比賽結束後再加罰時間的回溯性判決過於嚴厲。不過他認為賽會以
某種形式施加處罰是正確的決定。

“I think the rules are very clear,” Bourdais said.

“Maybe the penalty was a bit hard, but I think he's made the same mistake
[cutting chicanes] twice: he's done it in Magny-Cours and he's done it again
in Spa.

“I don't really understand why there's been such a mess around it.

“There's a rule book and everybody has to obey the same thing.

“The penalty is really rough but in the end it's up to you to give the
position back or not. Pretty straightforward.”

The Frenchman added that Hamilton had left himself exposed to the possibility
of a stewards’ investigation.

眼鏡哥認為，(比賽)規則寫得很清楚，每個車手都必須遵守。雖然罰得有點重，但連同法
國站事件 (按: 超Vettel+ 切西瓜)，Ham以經犯了兩次同樣的錯誤。規則是規則，至於
切完西瓜要不要讓位，終究是車手自己的決定。而Ham的行為將自己置於受到賽會調查的
風險中。

“You have to be responsible for what you decide to do, and in this
particular case, if you do gain an advantage like I said, you just give it
back and make sure that you don't expose yourself to penalties,” he said.

“I think it's the easiest way to handle it.”

眼鏡哥說，你得為自己的決定負責。在切完西瓜的當下，如果你真的從中得益，就得把位
置回還回去，以確保自己不致於有受罰的危險，這是最簡單的處理方法。

While McLaren data proved that Hamilton slowed to allow Ferrari rival Kimi
Raikkonen to re-pass him on rejoining the track, it is believed the stewards
felt his track cutting still gained him an advantage as he almost immediately
overtook the Finn again.

雖然M隊的資料顯示Ham切完西瓜後慢下來讓Kimi超越，但一般相信賽會幹事 (譯按：
Steward到底要怎麼翻啊?) 終究認為切西瓜為Ham帶來超車上的優勢，因為讓完車之後，
Ham幾乎立刻就反超了回去。

Nico Rosberg agrees that Hamilton would not have been right on the gearbox of
the Ferrari had he gone around the Bus Stop as normal – although he too
feels the penalty was out of proportion with how the race’s final two laps
played out.

“I definitely agree [with my colleagues], because he did get an advantage,
because he wouldn't have been that close behind Kimi had he not cut the
chicane,” the Williams driver said.

“But then again, I also think the penalty was a bit harsh as that did not
have such a big effect on the actual race result in the end.”

螺絲寶說他同意眼鏡哥的觀點，如果Ham乖乖跟在Kimi後面過bus stop彎的話，在直線
道上他就沒辦法黏在Kimi的車屁股後。不過螺絲堡也覺得Ham收到的判罰太重並且有失比
例原則，因為這個發生在最後兩圈的事件並沒有改變比賽結果。

Toyota’s Jarno Trulli added: “The penalty was quite big but I'm not a
steward and I cannot decide what kind of penalty should be given.

“But on the other hand, it was very clear that he got an advantage out of
it, so that's where it is.  The rules are very clear.

“If you cut the chicane and you get an advantage, you just have to drop back
and give back the position and in Lewis's case he shouldn't have attacked
straight away at the next corner; that was it.”

特努力說，這個判罰很大，不過他不是steward所以沒辦法決定到底該怎麼罰。但不論如
何，Ham確實從切西瓜當終得益。規則寫得很清楚，如果你切了西瓜又因此得益
，就必須讓位。就此次狀況而言，Ham不應該直接在下一個彎道發動攻勢。

Felipe Massa, the man who benefited most from Hamilton’s demotion as he
inherited the race victory, claimed earlier in the week that his title rival
had been “too optimistic” and said he had not changed his view on Thursday.

Massa在本週稍早說，他的對手(指Ham)當時太過"樂觀"。週四他依然秉持相同的看法。

“To be honest, I've given my ideas on this many times about what happened,"
Massa said.

“What's happened is that he took an advantage by cutting the chicane.

“You can ask other drivers how many overtaking manoeuvres you see there: no
overtaking.

“Going from the last corner to the first corner is such a small straight, so
he took an advantage, that's clear, that's my opinion, so it doesn't change.”

Massa說他已經發表過很多次見解啦，一切歸於Ham因切西瓜得利。
"你可以問問其他車手第一彎道有多少超車，答案是沒有。最末彎跟第一彎中間只有短短
的直線道，能在那邊超掉Kimi就表示Ham利用了切西瓜帶來的優勢。這很清楚，我的觀點
就是這樣，不會改變。"


--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 129.234.79.212
→ Inar:所以有問題的是fia
※ 編輯: shdai           來自: 129.234.79.212       (09/12 19:43)
推 square0705:我覺得FIA說okay是不是說讓位的行為okay但沒說可馬上超
→ Inar:請往上爬,這是有些瑕疵的~ 雖然我原本也是這樣想....
推 oldster:Massa: ..答案是通通不行！ ... XDD
※ 編輯: shdai           來自: 129.234.79.212       (09/12 21:36)
→ kimi206rc:FIA:還在吵~搞清楚比賽是誰辦的! 吵什麼吵 我說了算!!
→ shdai:樓上抱歉  最後一段好像有點翻錯  剛改了
※ 編輯: shdai           來自: 129.234.79.212       (09/12 21:38)
推 kafai:fia:禁止使用馬上超