精華區beta FORMULA1 關於我們 聯絡資訊
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/78776 FIA agrees to engine re-equalization The FIA has agreed to allow a re-equalisation of engines in Formula 1 next year if teams believe it is necessary, but has said moves will only be done so by pegging back the best power units. Last year, Renault was allowed to re-tune its engine to help bring its performance up to the level of its rivals - with some manufacturers having benefited from minor tweaking during the engine freeze. Calls for a further parity re-emerged after the Italian Grand Prix, when many teams believed that Mercedes-Benz had opened up a clear advantage at the front of the field. Red Bull Racing team principal Christian Horner told AUTOSPORT at Monza: "I think it is something that perhaps needs to be carefully looked at. "The FIA has all the information they can see where the differences are on, I don't think it is a coincidence that you have three Mercedes-powered teams that dominated six out of the top seven places in qualifying and looked dominant again here in the race today. "So, the FIA I am sure, they have all that information to hand, but it is always the danger of a freeze that you can freeze in a competitive advantage." Teams are set to discuss the matter soon and the FIA has made it clear that it will allow changes to be made if there is agreement from the outfits. But parity will not be brought about by bringing the worst power units up to the level of the best. In a statement issued after the FIA World Motor Sport Council hearing on Monday, the governing body said: "Following suggestions that there is a differential between the performance of engines used in Formula 1, the World Motor Sport Council has decided that should this be the case, and should the teams wish to eliminate this performance differential, they may be allowed to do so by reducing the performance of the more powerful engines. However, no engine upgrades will be allowed." Should this scenario happen, it could result in Mercedes-Benz being forced to make changes to its engine to bring its performance back down to the level of its rivals - although achieving this will be far from straightforward. 前年法拉力引擎馬力很大FIA坐視不管~ 去年同意讓雷諾增加研發改大馬力~ 今年要把麥拉倫引擎降低馬力~ 那現在是怎樣~乾脆跟cosworth訂購單一引擎算了啦~用單一製造商引擎比賽更省錢不是? 車廠研發落後在引擎凍結研發的規定下給予例外這就算了~ 車廠厲害研發強馬力大也不行了?這也要管? 引擎性能差異本來就會有的,更何況F1的精神不就是車廠team之間的競爭嗎? FIA為了錢老是出爾反爾~一開始不是大家協議好的了? 老是欺負McLaren是怎樣?判罰也判最重的 技術領先也要管~擺明是某車隊某車廠在背後跟FIA靠腰~FIA才出面解決~ 問題來了~那個某車隊某車廠前幾年好多年帳面上馬力排名屬一屬二就可以? 怎麼不順便也一起降低輸出功率,現在才要抗議呢? FIA向錢看的厲害程度真不是假的! -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 114.41.232.119
steven755047:雖然單就這件事同意你的觀點,不過歷史上也出現過為 09/22 14:27
Santander:某車廠的價值觀就是:我拿不到冠軍 你也別想拿! 09/22 14:28
steven755047:了削減法拉利優勢而更改規則的情況出現吧? 09/22 14:28
padro:我覺得後面言論太過情緒化了 09/22 14:39
sk2g:原本好像打算真的要統一引擎.. 09/22 14:43
Inar:你看04年的結果,再看05年的規則.... 09/22 14:58
Inar:判罰重?沒事不要拿自己的頭去撞牆壁就不會痛....XD 09/22 14:59
Santander:跟Renault比 09/22 15:22
wolfganghsu:你的觀點有很大問題,情緒化發言之前請多想想 09/22 15:51
Inar:跟Renault比起來確實是重~ 不過兩個車隊的處理方式差很多.... 09/22 15:59
joulin:原PO對紅色車廠 看來有不少的憤怒阿~~~~~~~~~~~ 09/22 16:27
zebirlin:因為FIA亂搞限制引擎兩年內不能研發.. 09/22 16:36
zebirlin:這樣明年非M牌引擎的都是下去陪跑的...收視率會很慘 09/22 16:37
svuper:那這樣BGP要不要尾翼也折一些下來? 有病嘛? 09/22 16:39
laytomall:$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ 09/22 16:53
Santander:不要亂解讀 我這是就事論事 09/22 17:29
Santander:不願意見到McLaren或者Ferrari其中一方沉淪 09/22 17:30
jameskoko:判罰輕重兩隊不能拿來比吧..又做不同的事... 09/22 17:42
etduke:我覺得叫麥拉崙調降不合理 讓其他隊調升比較OK 09/22 17:56
Inar:最好是不要限制~ 我要看22Krpm的引擎啦~ 09/22 18:01
yrchuo:真的要變成A1了... ( ︶︿︶)_╭∩╮ 09/22 18:03
giaour:原po是麥隊今年的贊助商之一! 明年將贊助__隊... 09/22 18:43
corlos:推原po一個,這邊紅迷多,當然不覺得他們有優勢(還覺得可憐 09/22 19:00
corlos:我雖然看得不長,不過從來沒看過法拉利會被判什麼罪 -.- 09/22 19:00
Santander:其嚴重性何者大何者小 一幾乎沒判罰;一罰1億+歸0積分 09/22 19:25
Santander:有沒有公平很清楚 大車隊用退出當要脅 FIA為了$ 退了不 09/22 19:26
Santander:知道幾步了... 09/22 19:26
SIG552:Ferrari被規則婊的故事也不少啊,不說05年的輪胎,光是Kers 09/22 20:30
SIG552:就讓紅軍多慘了... 09/22 20:30
SIG552:不過我也是反對引擎性能均衡化,這樣真的跟A1差不了多少了. 09/22 20:32
corlos:05年的輪胎.....科科,是法拉利自己獨大把B牌包了,其它隊 09/22 20:46
corlos:跳到M胎,M胎才壯大的,自己不適應還怪到使用者太少? 09/22 20:46
corlos:誰叫B胎偏愛紅軍那麼誇張,沒人規定紅車一定要用B胎 09/22 20:47
corlos:更別提那神奇的美國站,B胎總是壓著M胎打 09/22 20:48
lycan1978:退錢 退錢 害我那年花只有看到六輛賽車比賽啦 09/22 20:54
lycan1978:退錢 退錢 害我那年花錢只有看到六輛賽車比賽啦 09/22 20:55
giaour:樓上盤子! XD 09/22 20:58
gf65:我也要退錢!!去年去新加坡看到蛇 結果是作弊下的產物!!! 09/22 21:14
corlos:大蛇是Ferrari自己pit的問題,雷諾作弊可沒管這麼大 -.- 09/22 21:29
gf65:沒有SC哪來兩台排隊 哪來的著急 哪來的錯誤 哪來的蛇蛇 09/22 21:46
etduke:說一句難聽一點的 如果沒有陰招 去年新加坡冠軍 輪不到雷諾 09/22 21:50
etduke:羅斯堡、漢彌爾頓 要也是他們拿 更別說本來機會最大的F隊 09/22 21:51
etduke:沒記錯的話 紅軍正常PIT 出來也是在雷諾後面吧 09/22 21:56
etduke:紅軍去年PIT虛弱是事實 但 應該是在正常比賽下反映出來 09/22 22:04
etduke:而非是被陰了 還要被說"活該 誰叫你們有大蛇" 09/22 22:05
Santander:不要牽拖了 別隊就很正常的應付緊急狀況 09/22 22:06
Santander:要怪只能怪紅軍自己的紅綠燈 09/22 22:06
etduke:出車禍 被撞死的還要被嫌身體太虛 死了活該喔 科 09/22 22:07
Santander:你這是無限上綱 09/22 22:08
etduke:無線上網倒是真的 去年紅軍沒出大蛇 還不是要在雷諾後面 09/22 22:08
etduke:新加坡又難超 小新只要好好守 紅軍不是照樣要哭哭 09/22 22:09
etduke:還好紅軍去年有自爆 不然去年的世界冠軍歸屬又有得吵了 09/22 22:10
Santander:罰那麼輕 ROSBERG會服氣嗎= = 09/22 22:10
Santander:等紅軍去跟FIA上訴... 09/22 22:11
etduke:去年新加坡站怎麼調都不公平了 怎麼調都會有爭議 09/22 22:14
awayaway:哈~原Po捅到馬風窩.. 09/22 22:15
Santander:重跑啦 (誤 09/22 22:15
Santander:馬風窩? 09/22 22:16
etduke:個人是覺得 第一名從缺 雷諾當站積分(錢)至少要吐出來 09/22 22:16
etduke:當然 是狗吠火車啦 隨便聊聊 都河蟹了也沒用 09/22 22:17
etduke:倒是沒記者去問MASSA對本案的意見XD 我猜應該很火爆 09/22 22:22
brokenleg:MASSA沒差啦 被蛇咬 09/22 23:18
etduke:樓上腳都斷了 還敢笑MASSA 09/22 23:19
SIG552:B牌輪胎不適應?為何不說FIA為了婊Ferrai連換胎規則都綁死了 09/23 20:46
SIG552:...有人好像倒果為因喔... 09/23 20:46