[語文] PP1-SC-154

[prettyting (get a food in the door)]

Some patients who do not respond to therapies for depression may simply

have received inadequate treatment, having, for example, been prescribed a drug
                                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

at a dosage too low to be effective or having been taken off a drug too soon.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

(A) having, for example, been prescribed a drug at a dosage too low to be

effective or having been

(B) having, for example, a drug prescription that was ineffective because

the dosage was too low, or being

(C) as, for example, having too low of a dosage of a prescribed drug for it to

be effective, or being

(D) when they have, for example, been prescribed too low a drug dosage

to be effective, or were

(E) for example, when they have a drug prescription with a dosage

答案是A

實在不懂這題要從何下手...

已經看過PP-SC的詳解了...

詳解上所說的D和E的解釋不是很懂...

<詳解>

(D)     時態上不對稱，現在完成時與過去時並列have been prescribed...

or were taken off...；沒有表達原文的意思，因為when...引導的是時間狀語從句，

但原文的意思（尤其是用了for example）是列舉了兩種inadequate treatment的情況

（用了動名詞形式），而不是在什麼情況下會receive inadequate treatment。

(E)     時態上不對稱，與D選項相同；have在本句是實意動詞，不能充當or後面需要

的助動詞have。

麻煩高手們幫我解惑下這題~謝謝!


--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) 
◆ From: 60.245.116.133
推 abase0001:(D)中的連接詞"or"兩邊的時態不對稱,再加上for example
→ abase0001:後接的不是例子,而是when..,用來表達跟主要子句的時間
→ abase0001:關係,不是在舉例了,所以是錯誤選項
→ abase0001:(E)錯的更離譜了,原句是for example, v1... or v2...
→ abase0001:(E)卻把對稱的v1,v2改成只剩v1,v2跑去修飾dosage
→ abase0001:所以錯。
→ abase0001:本題找要是考時態與對稱,還有have做動詞時寫成having
→ abase0001:這種東西看到就可以直接刪掉,除非出現在完成式時態才ok
→ abase0001:我自己解這題過程是這樣的,看到having,刪ABC,D中的時態
→ abase0001:不對稱,刪,E是for example, when..刪,選項都刪光了
→ abase0001:再回頭看有沒有having是出現在完成式被我刪掉了,有,A
→ abase0001:檢查A後面的時態是否對稱,ok,所以答案選A
→ prettyting:感謝a大~理解啦!!