82. Every photograph, because it involves the light rays that something emits
hitting film, must in some obvious sense be true. But because it could
always have been made to show things differently than it does, it cannot
express the whole truth and, in that sense, is false. Therefore, nothing
can ever be definitively proved with a photograph.
Which one of the following is an assumption that would permit the conclusion
above to be properly drawn?
A. Whatever is false in the sense that it cannot express the whole truth
cannot furnish definitive proof.
B. The whole truth cannot be known.
C. It is not possible to determine the truthfulness of a photograph
in any sense.
D. It is possible to use a photograph as corroborative evidence
if there isadditional evidence establishing the truth about the scene
photographed.
E、If something is being photographed, then it is possible to prove
definitively the truth about it
恩。我現在在(A)和(D)之間掙扎。
答案是(A)
這是assumption，大部分這類問題都是要取非。但是，如果D要從哪裡取非?
那又要如何反駁題目?題目也是要取非嗎?
我不太懂。請各位幫忙一下這類ASSUMPTION問題。
謝謝!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 218.160.101.50