推 tgbh:既然公司不管有沒有自動化，繳的稅跟失業保險都會增加 05/24 02:52
→ tgbh:那不就意味著自動化並非造成稅金跟失業保險增加的原因嗎? 05/24 02:53
→ lovekyoko:那麼有反駁嗎?? 05/24 03:26
→ lovekyoko:喔 我懂了 感謝 05/24 03:56
In many corporations, employees are being replaced by automated equipment in
order to save money. However, many workers who lose their jobs to automation
will need government assistance to survive, and the same corporations that
are laying people off will eventually pay for that assistance through
increased taxes and unemployment insurance payments.
30. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the author's argument?
我想問C
(C)Taxes and unemployment insurance are also paid by corporations that are
not automating.
這不過就是說 沒有採取自動化的公司也要負擔稅和保險費
那哪裡有反駁勒???
解答是說
The fact that such costs are paid and will be paid by all corporations,
whether or not they automate, weakens the author's argument by suggesting
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
that the increased costs resulting from automation will be spread over a
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
wider group.
^^^^^^^^
請問後面這句是什麼意思
--
女:老闆.我要叫一桶瓦斯
我:小姐.幾點了.還在叫瓦斯啊
女:我要洗澡沒瓦斯啊.當然要叫瓦斯啊
我:我要打泡還找不到女人咧
女:我有再做.可以算你便宜一點喔.你要不要.我現在可以去你那邊
我:.......................... 來吧
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 203.73.254.112