精華區beta GMAT 關於我們 聯絡資訊
In comparison to the standard typewriter keyboard,the EFCO keyboard, which places the most-used keys nearest the typist's strongest fingers, allows faster typing and results in less fatigue. Therefore, replacement of standard keyboards with the EFCO keyboard will result in an immediate reduction of typing costs. Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the conclusion drawn above? 我只想問答案A和C (A)People who use both standard and EFCO keyboards report greater difficulty in the transition from the EFCO keyboard to the standard keyboard than in the transition from the standard keyboard to the EFCO keyboard. (C)The number of businesses and government agencies that use EFCO keyboards is increasing each year. 解答上說 A和C都是支持結論 結論是說 immediate reduction of typing costs. 但是A只是說明轉換的難度 C是說businesses and government agencies 對於 EFCO keyboards 的使用增加 沒有支持結論 我哪裡想錯了 冏 -- 我可以說出現在的心情嘛 將來的事我不知道 但是現在的心情絕對不是說謊 我能自信的如此說 我 只要你說的話 不論有多慢都會好聽 如果電話不能說清楚的話 就像這樣直接來見你 只要你走的話 不論多慢 我會陪著你走 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 203.67.96.133
fly12404:結論可以這樣想:使用EFCO的將會增加 是為了減少成本 05/15 16:29
fly12404:A是說用EFCO的人轉變成標準的比較難 而標準的轉變EFCO較 05/15 16:32
fly12404:易 ,所以以前用標準的可較容易轉變成低成本的EFCO=>增加 05/15 16:34
fly12404:所以A應該支持結論 C也是 05/15 16:34
fly12404:A:使用EFCO的還是用EFCO 而標準的可能變成EFCO 05/15 16:36
lovekyoko:感謝 05/15 16:37