精華區beta Hewitt 關於我們 聯絡資訊
Hewitt's weird win Bruce Wilson Paris 27may04 LLEYTON Hewitt got it right, on court and off, when he finally made it to the French Open late on a golden spring afternoon. "It was weird out there," he said, and so it was. Hewitt eventually beat the Casablanca-born Frenchman Arnaud Di Pasquale in a weird scoreline 6-0 7-6 (7-5) 4-6 6-1 and will now play the Austrian Jurgen Meltzer, whom he beat convincingly a couple of weeks ago in Hamburg. Weird, too, was the stat that showed that in the first set Hewitt struggled to get his service game anywhere at all much, missing with two out of three of his first serves. Yet he won it six-zip. Then, he lifted his game to where at one point about 80 per cent of his first serves were going in and he was not just struggling to hold serve but was broken in four consecutive service games and that cost him the third set. Weird. "You know, I think I was probably more aggressive on his service games than I was on mine," Hewitt said of a period in which seven of nine serves were dropped. It was, in fact, Di Pasquale who kept his nerve, and held for the set. Di Pasquale, who had an injury-plagued 2003 but was once ranked as high as 39th, had not played any senior tennis this year and was at Roland Garros on a deserved wildcard. After all, he did win France a bronze medal at the Sydney Olympics. The rustiness that gave Hewitt the first set so easily suddenly changed and until the Frenchman cramped in the fourth set, needing a lengthy treatment break and then really playing like a semi-cripple, he was giving Hewitt a hard time. Hewitt said Di Pasquale had nothing to lose, one of those cliches that are so often true. Although Hewitt won, it was Di Pasquale, who hadn't played for more than a year after serious back surgery, who inspired the crowd. When both players were at their best, it was a cracking match of prolonged and often violent rallies. John Fitzgerald and Wally Masur, the Davis Cup gurus, sat courtside urging the man they call "Rusty" on to greater things as Di Pasquale started to get the range. For all that, Hewitt served for the second set at 5-3 and was well broken. He needed all his reserves to win the tiebreak. So, for the first time since 1982 only one Australian has advanced to the second round of the French Open. That year Peter McNamara made it to the quarter-finals. The statistic continued to underline serious questions now being asked about the depth of Australian tennis. Hewitt suggested that one way would be to have more genuine claycourts in Australia. He said that after mastering clay -- the sliding, the movements needed -- the transition to other courts was easier than the other way around. Historians among us recalled that the last Australian to win here, Rod Laver in 1969, learnt his tennis playing on rolled ant-bed courts in the Queensland sticks near Gladstone, a surface very like clay. Laver and another ant-bed graduate, Roy Emerson, each won the French twice. They also won every other grand slam title. And so Hewitt had a point. He said: "I think you have to look at the 10, 12, 14-year-olds, on claycourts and learning how to move and slide." He thought that 16 was getting too old to learn. "I think it's a lot easier to adjust from a good claycourt player to become a good grass or hardcourt player than it is vice versa. The game has changed so much that you can play from the back of the court on all surfaces now." And for the benefit of anyone listening, he also said that it was "impossible" to play both tournament and Davis Cup tennis at the pace he has been. In a way, he said, being out of the Davis Cup now gave him a much better shot at winning this tournament. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 203.72.191.166 ※ 編輯: LleyHewitt 來自: 203.72.191.166 (05/27 10:41)