推 Alfielicious:很中肯也很有力的論點 推！ 06/29 09:03
推 bizarre0310:謝謝分享，唉都是因為麥可我從國中開始狂學英文的欣慰 06/29 09:27
紐約時報這篇寫得很好，
大家可以看看。
By DAVID SEGAL
Published: June 27, 2009
On Thursday night, a crowd gathered in Union Square in Manhattan for a fond
and spontaneous memorial to Michael Jackson. A few hundred onlookers
formed a circle, leaving enough space in the middle for the grandstanders
and the brave to dance like the King of Pop. Or try to.
Watching this spectacle, you had to wonder: When will this happen again?
When will another pop culture figure mean so much to so many that people
are moved to assemble, hug and dance?
This is a tribute, of course, to Mr. Jackson’s singular gifts — his voice,
songwriting talent, physical grace, and the list goes on and on.
But there is the related matter of historical timing. Fame on the level
that Mr. Jackson achieved is all but impossible for pop culture heroes
today, and quite likely it will never be possible again.
On the most basic level, this is matter of business and math.
Michael Jackson has sold an estimated 100 million copies worldwide of
the 1982 album “Thriller,” which spent more than 31 weeks at the top of
the Billboard charts.
It’s one of those high-water marks that nobody will touch, because record
stores are vanishing, and along with them, megahit albums are vanishing, too.
A big week on the Billboard charts is a quarter-million units sold, which
is about the number of units the Jonas Brothers moved last week with their
latest release, which opened at No. 1. And it’s rare for an album to last
even three weeks at the top.
People who buy music tend these days to buy — or steal it — online,
a song at time.
But even if nobody achieves album sales on a Jacksonian scale,
couldn’t he or she be an artist every bit as popular,
every bit as loved, every bit as listened to?
Probably not. The pop-idol field — like every field that can lead to
super-fame — is more crowded than it has ever been, and the variety of
routes to stardom keep growing. When the Beatles were on “The Ed Sullivan
Show” in 1964, more than 70 million people watched, that is, more than
one-third of the entire population of the United States. Yes, the Beatles
were that good. But at the time, there were three networks and the radio.
No Facebook, Twitter, video games, movie multiplexes, Sirius radio,
malls or a dozen other potential drains on an audience.
There weren’t a lot of rock bands, either. George Harrison was the only
Beatle who’d visited the United States before the group landed for that
historic performance — his sister lived in Illinois — and when he returned t
o England he gleefully informed his mates that nobody in America could
compete.
Likewise, Michael Jackson had MTV, which was the place for music videos,
and as close to an Ed Sullivan platform as he needed. Of course, it’s been
a long time since MTV played hour after hour of prime-time videos. Today,
you watch music videos on YouTube, but because there are no programmers
to curate what you see, every artist has to compete with thousands of
others. And now that anyone with a computer has a miniature studio,
and anyone with a Internet connection can post a song, there are more
genres, subgenres and artists than ever.
That’s why even Michael Jackson would have a hard time becoming Michael
Jackson these days. Come to think of it, Farrah Fawcett, who also passed
away this week, would never have become Farrah Fawcett if she showed up
in that red, one-piece bathing suit today. In the ’70s, she became the
fantasy of choice for every post-pubescent teenage boy in the country,
selling 10 million posters of her iconic, high-beam smile. Now, there
are so many vixens grinning seductively from so many Web sites and lad
mags that no single woman could ever commandeer the public imagination in
quite the same way. There is no “this year’s model” anymore.
There is this week’s model, and that’s about it.
There are plenty of upsides to the new unfiltered, multiple-choice pop
culture of 2009. We get to decide what we want to listen to and watch,
and we can listen and watch whenever we want. It’s far better for
aficionados, too, because they can dig deeper into any topic,
no matter how obscure. Obsessed with a soccer team in Germany?
Twenty years ago, you’d be lucky to spot it twice a year on TV.
Now, you can watch it online, and a dozen blogs are there to parse
every goal, red card and trade.
But there is something sad about our infinite menu of options. It could
very well mean the end of true superstardom and with it, the end the
collective experience on display Thursday night in Union Square.
Everyone there knew Michael Jackson. Everyone there had watched him,
sang with him, tried to dance with him and, yes, everyone was collectively
aghast by much of his recent behavior. But he was ours. If nothing else,
his passing reminds us of how little in pop culture we currently share.
And inadvertently, that Union Square memorial demonstrated why. In the
middle of the impromptu festivities, a pedicab cycled by with a
platform attached to the back. Jutting from the platform: a silver,
10-foot stripper pole, on which a woman in lingerie was spinning,
legs splayed, upside down, then right side up, then upside down again.
There were flashing lights and, inevitably, the name of a Web site stenciled
on the side.
Half of the people in the Michael Jackson throng spotted the rolling
spectacle and started pointing. A few dozen turned on their heels and
joined this woman and her cycler in a slow, jaw-dropping and highly
distracting procession down the street.
--
I'd rather be hated for who I am,
than loved for who I am not.
Kurt Cobain
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.169.9.82
※ 編輯: zidane666 來自: 118.169.9.82 (06/29 06:00)