推 misson:放大絕招嗎 XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD 61.62.214.224 04/04 02:13
→ Fallanakin:跑到國外讀也只學到放大絕嗎XD 203.68.127.6 04/04 02:18
※ 引述《markwu123 (統一獅Ace投手：馬克吳)》之銘言：
: : what's this??
: 為什麼看不懂？
: 正揮謹選，才是王道
: 故意揮慢去做自以為巧打的
: 這根本打不到
: 而且巧打要球棒能力控制力好
: 以黃甘霖以前的狀況，是一點都沒辦法做到
: : how do you know??
: 因為我有眼睛
: 他揮棒就是像一個溼掉的紙盤一樣
same thing to you.
what level of basebll you play.
why you can see the flaw and players and coaches who play in pro level
can't?
no offense, i just believe professionals and this is my way of thinking.
: : what's this??
: 希望碰到球，可是碰不到
do you know how hard to contact balls in a unbalanced hitting
stance??
do you think he does this way of hitting in his batting practice??
have you watched him doing batting practice?
in batting practice, players present his normal mechanics
almost every time of hitting, but in game, when they face real
pitchers with a variation of pitch kinds, they were cheated
sometimes. the results most end up with a ugly hitting mechanics
and that's the reason why #53 hit poorly in the pic at that at-bat
.
: 好像這一句沒那麼深吧？
: : to me, this post is basically of trash talks.
: : Arguments are weak and pointless.
: : just tell me what's the problem in his swing
: : mechanics and what's the difference between now
: : and before.
: 要不要我直接找milktea分析黃甘霖的揮棒動作給你看
: http://blog.xuite.net/johnason/milktea/3494235
this guy chose a wrong at-bat that #53 was fooled by
a pitch that he didn't expect or that he was never good at.
that is not his nomral hitting mechanics, so his whole analysis
is worthless to me.
what if i choose a pic that A-rod was fooled by a gyroball or whatever
which ends up with a ugly swing, and you still think that makes perfect
sense to use this at-bat to analyses?? and say that he has problems with
his hitting mechanices?
: : sorry, i just can't have a reason to convince myself
: : by reading your post.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 128.59.150.90