精華區beta Management 關於我們 聯絡資訊
我可以問一下各位大大… 母公司、子公司、分公司的定義為何嗎… 謝謝各位大大… -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 218.174.155.89 > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- < 作者: ssiou (毛毛) 看板: Management 標題: Re: 母公子、子公司、分公司… 時間: Tue Oct 5 01:31:08 2004 母子公司為相對的概念 對外均為一獨立的經濟個體 定義上來說一公司持有另一公司超過50%股權 (如果是互相持股則是相互投資公司) 則稱兩公司為母子公司的關係 通常是上下游的關係 在財務報導上需合併揭露 分公司則是因為地理上的方便 在登記的地址外 另外成立生產或勞務相類似的公司 -- 如果有錯請大大指正 也請大大們多多批評 ※ 引述《sinyulynn (★到底要往哪裡走?★)》之銘言: : 我可以問一下各位大大… : 母公司、子公司、分公司的定義為何嗎… : 謝謝各位大大… -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 220.134.152.190 > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- < 作者: Laird (taiwan No.ONE!!!!) 看板: Management 標題: Re: 母公子、子公司、分公司… 時間: Wed Oct 6 11:06:58 2004 ※ 引述《ssiou (毛毛)》之銘言: : 母子公司為相對的概念 : 對外均為一獨立的經濟個體 : 定義上來說一公司持有另一公司超過50%股權 In the Australian contect, holding company doesn't need to have over 50% of ownership to claim one as its sub. Instead, as long as holding company has the "capacity" to control one cmopany's financial and operating policies, holding company is said to have control of that company, regardless the precentage of shares held by parent. whether to consolidate is dependent on whether the parent has control over someone. not dependent on how many shares held. Is it the same in Taiwan? there probably is a slight difference on the definition of "control" in these 2 countries. : (如果是互相持股則是相互投資公司) : 則稱兩公司為母子公司的關係 通常是上下游的關係 : 在財務報導上需合併揭露 : 分公司則是因為地理上的方便 : 在登記的地址外 另外成立生產或勞務相類似的公司 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 150.203.24.3
RungTai:推~ 140.127.179.242 10/07
ssiou:感謝指正~~~ 220.134.152.190 10/07
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- < 作者: pplin (雙手離開桌面!) 看板: Management 標題: Re: 母公子、子公司、分公司… 時間: Sat Oct 9 20:53:57 2004 ※ 引述《Laird (taiwan No.ONE!!!!)》之銘言: : ※ 引述《ssiou (毛毛)》之銘言: : : 母子公司為相對的概念 : : 對外均為一獨立的經濟個體 : : 定義上來說一公司持有另一公司超過50%股權 : In the Australian contect, holding company doesn't need to have over : 50% of ownership to claim one as its sub. Instead, as long as holding : company has the "capacity" to control one cmopany's financial and : operating policies, holding company is said to have control of that : company, regardless the precentage of shares held by parent. : whether to consolidate is dependent on whether the parent has : control over someone. not dependent on how many shares held. : Is it the same in Taiwan? there probably is a slight difference on : the definition of "control" in these 2 countries. yep...the definition of control is a little bit different 根據中華民國財務會計準則公報第七號 合併財務報表 母公司乃指對被投資公司具有「控制能力」之公司 「控制能力」之定義為:直接及經由子公司間接持有一公司超過半數之普通股股權 才稱為具有控制能力 期末當然要編制合併報表囉~ 有錯請指正 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 203.70.118.59 > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- < 作者: Laird (taiwan No.ONE!!!!) 看板: Management 標題: Re: 母公子、子公司、分公司… 時間: Sat Oct 9 21:15:04 2004 ※ 引述《pplin (雙手離開桌面!)》之銘言: : ※ 引述《Laird (taiwan No.ONE!!!!)》之銘言: : : In the Australian contect, holding company doesn't need to have over : : 50% of ownership to claim one as its sub. Instead, as long as holding : : company has the "capacity" to control one cmopany's financial and : : operating policies, holding company is said to have control of that : : company, regardless the precentage of shares held by parent. : : whether to consolidate is dependent on whether the parent has : : control over someone. not dependent on how many shares held. : : Is it the same in Taiwan? there probably is a slight difference on : : the definition of "control" in these 2 countries. : yep...the definition of control is a little bit different : 根據中華民國財務會計準則公報第七號 合併財務報表 : 母公司乃指對被投資公司具有「控制能力」之公司 : 「控制能力」之定義為:直接及經由子公司間接持有一公司超過半數之普通股股權 : 才稱為具有控制能力 : 期末當然要編制合併報表囉~ : 有錯請指正 As I don't have access to Taiwan's Accounting Standards (or simply i dont know where to look it up), is it possible to tell me, besides this ">50% share ownership" requirement, if there's anything else that would qualify one as a parent. Again, in Australia, as long as you can fit into one of the followings, you will be deemed as having "the capacity of control" over a company: (1) in general, >50% of share ownership (no doubt!) (2) control on one company's financial AND operating policies (3) >50% of representation of the board of directors (as weird as it might sound, having >50% of share ownership doesnt necessariliy give you a dominant position in the board of directors. ) that's all on the top of my head now.. :) Additional information on related stuff is that in order to be recognised as an associate of someone: (1) generally speaking, a >20% of share ownership will do, (2) have influence on either financial or opeating policies. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 150.203.24.3