[外電] Dallas Mavericks' Dampier still baffled by ejection

[popstarkirby (中肯 正直 不嘴砲 POP)]

http://tinyurl.com/ydgmllk




 A day later, Erick Dampier still couldn't figure out what happened when he
got ejected from Friday night's loss to Houston.

It was the play at the root of the Mavericks' protest of the game, which was
being formally prepared Saturday evening. The Mavericks had 48 hours after
the game to get the protest and the $10,000 fee to the league.

Dampier has replayed the situation in his mind and watched the film and still
doesn't get it, though he does see the humor in it.

"I've never been in that situation before, where a player gets fouled and
they get a technical and then they get ejected," Dampier said with a chuckle.
"How is that possible? OK, if you want to eject me, can I at least shoot my
two free throws? And it was a flagrant [committed against Dampier]? But the
result of that play is they kick me out?"

Strange, indeed. The referees were convinced Dampier threw an elbow and went
to the videotape to review the play, but did so before they had decided Aaron
Brooks was responsible for a flagrant foul-penalty 1 against Dampier.
Flagrant foul-penalty 2 infractions can be reviewed, but not penalty 1
flagrants.

The Mavericks were convinced that the elbow officials said Dampier threw was
not discovered until the review, which they say never should have happened.

"I think it was a nice Christmas present from the refs to me," said Dampier,
who said it was the first ejection of his career. "Somebody grabs you from
behind and pulls you down. They said it looked like I threw an elbow, but I
didn't. He pulled me in a way that my momentum took me to the right and made
it look like I threw an elbow. But I didn't. I think it was a wrong call and
it really could have been a difference in the game.

"You could tell watching their review and how long it took them to go over it
three or four times that nothing good was going to come out of it. I mean,
I'm thinking he's going to review the foul and all of the sudden he says
there's a T on No. 25 and he's ejected. I didn't really understand it. But
we're not going to blame the game on that one call."

The Mavericks were fortunate to get to overtime and didn't make enough plays
in the extra period to win. But the elbow call on Dampier, not to mention a
clear-path foul on Jason Terry and a discrepancy on how much time was left
when the ball went out of bounds on the last possession of regulation, all
were part of the Mavericks' protest.

The league had no comment other than to say the protest had not been filed.

"The only thing I'll say is they'll get it right in New York," coach Rick
Carlisle said of the league office's review. "They [the referees] indicated
some things, but so as not to lead to further confusion, I won't repeat what
they said.

"I'm not going to spend money [get fined] talking about what those guys did
or didn't do. If there were wrong calls, technicals will be rescinded and
whatever happens, happens. Everyone's money is better spent doing something
else."



蛋皮還沒搞清楚狀況時

他已經被請出場了

達拉斯官方有48小時可以抗議

還有繳交一萬鎂的罰款

對此蛋皮笑著表示

我從來沒遇過這種情況

人家犯我規

然後我被判技術犯規驅逐出場

"至少讓我先把兩罰罰完吧"

小牛這方說蛋皮並沒有出拐

裁判則是堅持有

蛋皮說

我覺得這是裁判送我的聖誕節禮物

人家把你扯下來

然後說你出拐要打人

我沒有出拐

我被拉下來看起來像有出拐

但我沒有

Carlisle說

我相信官方會處理的

我不想冒著被罰款的風險去發表任何意見

錢不該花在這種事上(被罰款)

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) 
◆ From: 114.38.50.112
→ UNdracula   :庫班:老卡~你去放放砲~錢的事我負責~
推 amadis01    :這場真的被表很大....
推 SKnight     :裁判：我不一定專業　但是請尊重我的"權威"
→ SKnight     :      不是因為我明察秋毫　而是單純因為我就是裁判
推 xtexte28    :金凱瑞:錢從口出 不如閉嘴
推 KIDD7576    :幽默蛋皮~~~
推 kk0610      :TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT