精華區beta Mavericks 關於我們 聯絡資訊
http://tinyurl.com/yabq63r It's a nonissue, and don't worry. As long as the Mavericks are winning, it won't become an issue. Not when it comes to playing time split between Erick Dampier and Drew Gooden. But there's a bigger picture that needs to be examined. The more games Dampier continues to pile up like Tuesday's against Houston, the tougher it's going to be to sit him. That said, there's no way the franchise allows Dampier to get to the minutes-threshold incentive that would trigger the final year of his seven-year contract at a guarantee of more than $13 million. Ain't gonna happen. But imagine the uncomfortable situation if Dampier keeps rolling up numbers like the 14 points, 20 rebounds and three blocks (with no missed shots) he had against the Rockets. How can you not keep that kind of production on the court when you really need it? While Dampier was on the court, which was for 33 minutes against the Rockets, the Mavericks were a plus-20. Hard to argue with that – if it keeps happening consistently. And if it does, it's going to be important to continue to watch those minutes that accumulate. 蛋皮本季不論上多久 或打多好 他第七年合約條件都不會達成 *註 不過如果他繼續這樣表現 小牛會很希望他留下來 另外上季蛋皮好像只有3次double double 本季開季7場以來已經三次了 * Dampier's 2010-11 year is FULLY unguaranteed. There is no buyout clause. The conditions are as follows: a) He has to make the all-star game 3 of the first 6 years on his 7 year contract, which he already failed. b) He has to play 2100 minutes in his top (minute wise) 70 games in 2009-10. If he does not play 70 games, then all his minutes together must be at least 2100 minutes. Now, he has not avg 30mpg EVER as a Mav and it is controlled by the coach & front office anyways. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 114.38.30.73
dmdjjj :註解內容其實是在外國論壇中找到的 實際完整合約內容 11/11 18:34
dmdjjj :我們是無法得知的 但可確定的是 他確實無法有第七年 11/11 18:34
dmdjjj :合約囉~ 11/11 18:35
sanson1100 :太早讓他知道有下一張,怎麼看他開無雙咧 11/12 00:04