推 JennyGarner:推找XX快遞,不過這樣子得獎結果更難預料了 218.173.8.208 01/21
推 Vassili242:大概是伊斯威特忘記報名截止日期了吧...XD 218.168.44.187 01/21
以下幾張原聲帶出於我不知道的理由,
無法被奧斯卡提名:
1.Ray-Craig Armstrong
2.Shrek2- Harry Gregson-Williams
3.Collateral-James Newton Howard
!4.Aviator-Howard Shore!
5.Million Dollar Baby-Clint Eastwood
5張金球獎提名裡,兩張確定陣亡了.....
--
If you prick us, do we not bleed?
If you tickle us, do we not laugh?
If you poison us, do we not die?
And if you wrong us, shall we not revenge?
If we are like you in the rest, we will resemble you in that.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.119.195.86
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- <
作者: Ozzilla (三歪) 看板: Movie-Score
標題: Re: 幾張無法被奧斯卡提名的原聲帶.....
時間: Fri Jan 21 02:28:23 2005
※ 引述《Herreweghe (Damien Rice)》之銘言：
: 以下幾張原聲帶出於我不知道的理由,
: 無法被奧斯卡提名:
: 1.Ray-Craig Armstrong
"Ray" was eliminated based on music rule B.5.(e):
"scores diminished in impact by the predominant use of songs."
( 配樂比重偏低 )
: 2.Shrek2- Harry Gregson-Williams
"Shrek 2" reportedly was dropped b/c much of the material was based on
the first "Shrek" score.
( 沿用前作旋律 )
: 3.Collateral-James Newton Howard
"Collateral" was another case of the director using a variety of music
and not primarily the work of a single composer.
( 配樂比重偏低 )
: !4.Aviator-Howard Shore!
Academy officials wouldn't comment on the record, but (Academy's music
branch executive) committee sources confirmed "Aviator's" score ran
afoul of music rule B.5.(d): "scores diluted by the use of tracked or
pre-existing music."
( 原創/配樂比重偏低 )
: 5.Million Dollar Baby-Clint Eastwood
Eastwood's "Million Dollar Baby" score failed to qualify b/c the
paperwork was submitted too late for committee consideration.
( 報名送件過晚 )
: 5張金球獎提名裡,兩張確定陣亡了.....
消息來源：Variety.com - Award Central 2005
1. 如果影藝學院十年前就施行這種嚴格規範， Hans Zimmer 恐怕要到 Alan
Silvestri 或 Thomas Newman 的家裡才能找到他的小金人。
2. 第五點會不會太誇張呀？找FedEx呀...使命必達耶...
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 203.73.155.5
※ 編輯: Ozzilla 來自: 203.73.155.5 (01/21 02:38)