Re: [問題] 如果西部2345都是54-28,名次應該怎么定?

[celestial318 (強尼)]

原文恕刪

http://www.nba.com/features/seedingprimer07.html


The top four seeds will be the three division winners plus the team with the

next best record. Those four will be ordered by record (and tiebreakers if

needed), so it's possible that two teams in the same division could hold the

top two spots, with the other two division winners at Nos. 3 and 4.


前四種子分別為三個分組冠軍以及此三隊外戰績最好的球隊，而這四個球隊的種子排名

則是依照他們的戰績來排序(若有平手的狀況則需要參考tiebreaker，此條件晚點會在加以

說明)，所以也有可能會出現同一分組內戰績最好的兩支球隊剛好分別為分區前兩種子的情

況。


Seeds 5 through 8 are the next four teams according to record (and tiebreakers

if needed).


而第五到第八種子就是依序排下來戰績較佳的四支球隊(若有平手狀況同樣需要參考

tiebreaker)。


First Round matchups are as follows:
‧1 vs. 8
‧4 vs. 5
‧2 vs. 7
‧3 vs. 6


這就不加以解釋了。


Conference Semifinals matchups are as follows:
‧1-8 Winner vs. 4-5 Winner
‧2-7 Winner vs. 3-6 Winner


這是分區準決賽的對戰順序。


Homecourt advantage for any series is determined by record, not seed. So, it's

possible that the 5 seed could have homecourt advantage over the 4, or that the

6 seed could have homecourt advantage over the 3.


在任何系列賽的對戰中，主場優勢是由對戰兩隊其中戰績較優者所取得，所以有可能會出

現種子順序較低卻取得主場優勢的情況。


Tiebreakers
(1) Head-to-head
(2) Division record (if the teams are in the same division)
(3) Conference record
(4) Record vs. Playoff teams, own conference
(5) Record vs. Playoff teams, other conference
(6) Net points, all games


最後是此篇的重點，tiebreaker的條件。在兩隊戰績相同時依序考慮下列的條件來決定兩

隊間的種子排名或是主場優勢的取得:

1. 兩隊之間的對戰戰績

2. 與分組內其他球隊的對戰成績(若兩球隊在同一分組的條件下)

3. 與同分區球隊的對戰成績

4. 與同分區已確定進入季後賽的隊伍之對戰成績

5. 與另一分區已確定進入季後賽的隊伍之對戰成績

6. 球隊所有比賽的淨得失分和


http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/matchups


tiebreaker的條件後來又有做過變更


Two-Team Tiebreaker

1. Division winner (this criterion is applied regardless of whether the tied

teams are in the same division)

2. Better record in head-to-head games

3. Higher winning percentage within division (if teams are in the same division

)

4. Higher winning percentage in conference games

5. Higher winning percentage against playoff teams in own conference

6. Higher winning percentage against playoff teams in opposite conference

7. Higher point differential between points scored and points allowed


多了第一項，身為分組冠軍者自動取得較高的種子順位。

不過這7項條件只適用於當只有兩隊戰績平手時，當平手隊伍為三隊或以上時，又有另外

的規則:


Three-Team Tiebreaker

1. Division winner (this criterion is applied regardless of whether the tied

teams are in the same division)

2. Best head-to-head winning percentage among all teams tied

3. Highest winning percentage within division (if teams are in the same

division)

4. Highest winning percentage in conference games

5. Highest winning percentage against playoff teams in own conference

6. Highest point differential between points scored and points allowed


理論上差不多，只是在考慮對戰成績時要將與所有平手隊伍的成績都考慮進去，另外不考

慮與另一分區季後賽球隊的對戰成績。


--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.229.112.80
→ greatodin:大家都在上面戰 這篇文章沒人鳥喔
推 smilehorse:推原PO認真回文
推 dragon8332:認真推
→ greatodin:我看上篇的快刪文來看這篇的解答吧
推 pttsac:直接寄信給他吧  他應該不會看上一篇文章了
推 fayray77:謝謝解答
推 DDMO:推這篇
推 suwilliam:推認真回答文
推 holahola001:清流
推 DDRent5566:推
推 rainingdayz:清流推
推 amuro0126:分區制度 會不會有點不公平啊?
→ scott206:推認真 上一篇一堆奇奇怪怪的推文
推 vzdce:推, 上面那篇已經很明顯的一堆人病了=.=
推 Denimfan:推認真清流~
推 dragon8332:上一篇已經沒有討論的價值了 跟原文脫節
推 showyi:今年有新增規則喔 這是2007年的
推 k2143:別說什麼認真就輸了，這個版就是太久不認真所以廢人一堆...
→ showyi:tiebreak 1和2點間有分組冠軍贏非分組冠軍
→ greatodin:他的問題雖然每年都出現 不過也不算廢文 但是簡體礙眼
→ showyi:另外第6點應該是淨得失而不是總得分
→ celestial318:感謝提醒 我修改一下
※ 編輯: celestial318    來自: 61.229.112.80        (04/11 14:55)
※ 編輯: celestial318    來自: 61.229.112.80        (04/11 14:56)
※ hstf:轉錄至看板 Test                                            04/11 14:56
推 hstf:借轉馬刺版~謝謝!
※ hstf:轉錄至看板 Spurs                                           04/11 14:57
推 blackkane:認真好文就是該推~ 辛苦了!
推 Clayton:這篇才該推啊.上面一堆小鼻小眼討什麼戰.
推 pttsac:推文別無聊了  不要毀了這篇
推 fayray77:看到一篇解答文,轉給大家網址:
→ fayray77:http://sports.sina.com.cn/k/2009-04-11/13374318842.sh
→ fayray77:ml
推 giunrz:顯然需要教學縮網址 不過還是推一個
→ dmdjjj:推
推 jiuan1027:主場優勢是由對戰兩隊其中"戰績"較優者所取得...這是指
→ jiuan1027:原本戰績還是指兩隊對戰的戰績?
推 h11wolfkhan:PUSH
推 jiuan1027:如果前提是西部2345都是54-28這個情況 那其實也沒差
→ celestial318:原文只說record 我想應該是總戰績
推 victor0218:哈哈，回文回太久被搶先解答了顆顆
推 jackloutter:推~
推 TuChicken:這篇可以m吧