推 jaminson:so that's why there has to be a tournament playoff.. 12/05 12:16
※ 引述《archited (House Slave)》之銘言：
: 如果Michigan勝USC,然後OSU輸給UF
: 這樣三隊都是只有一敗,能分的出誰是真正的第一嗎?
: 我是覺得,"不希望rematch"的因素應該不能拿來做為"選出全國最強的兩隊"時的考量
Alright, Let's say Michigan does play OSU in the BCS champ. game.
And no matter who wins, Is the winner of that game the #1 team in
the nation?
No, because how can you prove that the best big10 team is better than SEC
team for sure? We didn't face each other on the field. Michigan
only play a Vanderbilt SEC team this year. And OSU? none.
And just based on your question? The UF vs OSU match up looks better to
determine who's the best team. At least OSU did beat Michigan this year,
yes, you can say all you want about home field advantage. This is a crappy
system, and you should blame big10 conference not to play the title game
in a "Neutral Field". And now blaming the nation that we didn't give big10
the Glendale, Arizona as your "Neutral Field". Come on~
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 72.209.72.106
※ 編輯: tetsulin 來自: 72.209.72.106 (12/05 12:07)
※ 編輯: tetsulin 來自: 72.209.72.106 (12/05 12:11)