[試題] 98下 梁益堉 哲學概論丙 期末考

[iamredlight (光~)]

課程名稱︰哲學概論丙
課程性質︰通識(醫學系必選通識哲概三個老師中的一個)
課程教師︰梁益堉
開課學院：醫學院
開課系所︰醫學系
考試日期（年月日）︰2010/6/22
考試時限（分鐘）：2小時
是否需發放獎勵金：是
（如未明確表示，則不予發放）

試題 :

考前兩週已經公布題目於ceiba

六題

會選其中三題，今天選的是1.4.6

1.(1)In "What it is like to be a bat" Nagel argues against both physicalism
(the identity theory) and functionalism. What is Nagel's argument? (2)
According to your view, is Nagel's argument successful? Why?

2.(1)Nagel suggest "an objective phenomenology not dependent on empathy or
the imagination" as a first step toeard a better account of the subjective
aspect of consciousness. What does he mean by objective phenomenology? (2)
Do you agree with it and why?

3.(1)What is the Higher-Order Thought(HOT) theory of consciousness? (2)
Describe an example and ezplain how HOT theory accounts for the difference
between conscious and unconscious mental states. (3)According to your
evaluation, is this theory adequate? Why?

4.(1)How does the HOT theory explain phenomenal consciousness? (2)What is the
problem of radical confabulation against the HOT theory? (3)Discuss an
empirical case and evaluate whether this problem really refutes the theory.

5.(1)According to yoir view, what is self-consciousness? (2)Is
self-consciousness fundamentally different from consciousness of ordinary
physical object like table and flowers? Why? (3)Explain "body ownership"
and "mental ownership". According to your view, what is the relation between
them?

6.(1)What is Shoemaker's immunity principle(IEM)? How is it related to
self-consciousness? (2)Discuss somatoparaphrenia or Body Swap Illusion.
Does either of these ttwo casa provide a genuine counterexample against the
immunity principle? Why ?

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) 
◆ From: 61.230.120.59
推 ray86047    :秒ＰＯ！