→ susustar:已收 01/24 16:36
課程名稱︰政治學一
課程性質︰政治學系必修
課程教師︰李錫錕
開課學院：社會科學院
開課系所︰政治學系
考試日期（年月日）︰2008.01.18
考試時限（分鐘）：100 (3:05~4:45)
是否需發放獎勵金：yes
（如未明確表示，則不予發放）
試題：
1.為何「雙之連結」(pair-bond)一旦成為人類生活的基本單位，這種建立在雙之連結的
生存形式促成了人類的急速進化，成為生物世界的一支獨秀的優越物種？
2.試從政治力的「精神力」(virtuality power)角度評估十五六世紀西歐文藝復興
(Renaissance)對西方社會的衝擊(impact)。
3.將下列英文譯為中文(外籍生免)並回答下列問題：
To refrain from mutual injury, mutual violence, mutual exploitation, to
equate one's own will with that of another: this may in a certain rough sense
become good manners between individuals if the conditions for it are present
(namely, if their strength and value standards are in fact similar and they
both belong to one body). As soon as there is a desire to take this
principle further, however, and if possible even on the fundamental principle
of society, it at once reveals itself for what it is: as the will to the
denial of life, as the principle of dissolution and decay. One has to think
this matter thoroughly through to the bottom and resist all sentimental
weakness: life itself is essentailly appropriation, injury, overpowering of
the strange and weaker, suppression, severity, imposition of one's own forms,
incorporation and, at the least and mildest, exploitation－but why should one
always have to employ precisely those words which have from of old been
stamped with a slanderous intention? Even that body within which, as was
previously assumed, individuals treat one another as equals－this happens in
every healthy aristocracy－must, if it is a living and not a decaying body,
itself do all that to other bodies which the individuals within it refrain
from doing to one another: it will have to be the will to power incarnate,
it will want to grow, expand, draw to itself, gain ascendancy－not out of any
morality or immorality, but because it lives, and because life is will to
power.
康德(Immaneul Kant)的超高本能(transcendentalism)與黑格爾(Georg W.F. Hegel)的
主觀意志(subjective will)與尼采的權力意志(will to power)對政治力的論述表面似
乎不同，其實在邏輯上有其一以貫之之處，試說明之。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.244.116