精華區beta NTU-Exam 關於我們 聯絡資訊
課程名稱︰個體經濟學 課程性質︰經濟系必修 課程教師︰黃貞穎 開課學院:社會科學院 開課系所︰經濟系 考試日期(年月日)︰2007.11.12 考試時限(分鐘): 110分鐘 是否需發放獎勵金:y (如未明確表示,則不予發放) 試題 : 1. This question does not have a standard answer. We will be completely neutral in grading it. It aims to see how you think about an economic problem. So please just let your imagination go wild but do use your reasoning ability. I personally like this question very much and hope you will enjoying answering it. Do carefully think about it. Consider the following imaginary scenario. Suppose all nations in the world agree that we ought to have a stock market for nations just like we have stock markets for private companies. To do so, each current citizen of a nation will be issued a share of that nation. For instance, there are roughly 23 million Taiwanese now, so each Taiwanese will be given a share of being Taiwanese. Therefore there will be 23 million shares of being Taiwanese in total. Take another example. Suppose there are roughly 300 million Americans. Then each Anericans will be given a share of being Americans. Hence in total there will be 300 million shares of being Americans. Let us ignore that people might be born or die and also ignore the problem that some people may have citizenship of more than one country to simplify. Now we have a stock market where people can trade their shares So immediately there will be market prices for shares of nations in the world. And a share of each nation may differ of course. The only trading rule in this market is as follows. If you currently own a share of country X, and you want to be a citizen of country Y instead, then you have to sell your share of country X and buy a share of country Y in at the same time. So at any moment of time, each person is a citizen of one and only one country. The number of citizens in each country therefore does not change even if trade is allowed. Assume that this is the only change we introduce to this world. The institution, political system and all other things of each nation you can imagine do not change because of the introduction of this stock market. In a nutshell, we just introduce a stock market for nationalities. (a) (25%) Comparing the way we get citizenship to the way proposed in this question, use your economic intuitions, knowledge, creativity and imagination to logically argue whether the stock market is a good or bad idea to determine citizenship. (b) (10%) Predict the top 5 countries in this market (the 5 countries which have the highest prices) and intuitively explain why you think so. (c) (5%) List the top country that you are willing to pay the highest to get the citizenship and intuitively explain why you want to do so. 2. Consider a very poor consumer who spends his daily income of $6 on bread (X) which costs $0.25 per unit and milk (Y) which costs $1 per unit. His preferences can be described by the utility function U(X,Y) = XY^3 (a) (10%) Find this person's daily consumption of bread and milk (b) (10%) Given this consumer's preferences,are bread and milk normal or inferior goods? Explain how you know. (c) (20%) Because this consumer is so poor, he must worry about getting the minimum daily amount of an important nutrient that he needs to stay alive. He gets one unit of the nutrient per unit of bread and one unit of the nutrient per unit of milk. He needs at least 10 units of nutrient per day to stay alive. Draw this consumer's budget set,taking account of both this subsistence constraint and his dollar budget constraint. (Hint: His budget set should now be the part of his dollar budget set which gives him at least 10 units of nutrient.) Does the consumption bundle you found in (a) satisfy the cosumer's subsistence constraint? (d) (20%) Now suppose the price of bread rises to $0.5 per unit. Draw the consumer's new budget set. Find the consumer's new optimal amounts of bread and milk, take account of both his dollar budget constraint and his subsistence constraint. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.217.213.33 ※ 編輯: zeedtw 來自: 61.217.213.33 (11/13 23:41)