※ 引述《KevinLan (Posaunenblaeser)》之銘言：
: 舉例來說...
: 和聲的金字塔理論不是絕對正確的...
: 或者只要語氣說的肯定就一定不對...
: 否則這是在告訴我們:
: 如果今天我們已經有了一個完美的和聲...
: 然後我們在這個和聲的最底下加一個很小聲的、低八度的低頻...
: 這樣和聲該變得怎麼樣呢?
: 如果我們加的低頻夠小聲...
: 甚至小到聽不見...
: 那這個和聲應該還是幾乎一樣的完美...
: 可是金字塔理論告訴你這和聲完蛋了...
: ...
: 顯然不對... right?
I cannot agree with this.
"mathematically" you can add a bass under the previous root
and then make that new note as weak as you can. But this is not
music.
If a composer write a triad C-E-G, no question you play
the root -- C louder than the other two. If he add another
C under that triad to make it four parts, then it is C-C-E-G.
There is no way you can make the now bass C weak and claim
that is a good chord. This is not waht the composer want.
If you play a good chord or not depends on what is written
on the music.
Hsuan-Yi Chen
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.twbbs.org)
◆ From: 136.142.123.121