※ 引述《hschen (H-Y)》之銘言：
: "mathematically" you can add a bass under the previous root
: and then make that new note as weak as you can. But this is not
: music.
哈...
沒錯...
這是數學家的把戲...
確實不是音樂...
: If a composer write a triad C-E-G, no question you play
: the root -- C louder than the other two. If he add another
: C under that triad to make it four parts, then it is C-C-E-G.
: There is no way you can make the now bass C weak and claim
: that is a good chord. This is not waht the composer want.
: If you play a good chord or not depends on what is written
: on the music.
所以我原文並沒有以這個例子做總結啊...
我的結論是...
要在意到底要求的什麼...
而非只是拿金字塔原理當定律...
( 不過學生們常常會這麼做... )
btw...
底下這樣的一個和聲又該如何?
F-G-B-d
並不是 F 該最大聲吧?
( 甚至哪個大聲還得看作曲家的想法... )
或者就原本那個 C-c-e-g 來講...
是不是一定 C 最大聲呢?
要反駁金字塔原理不難咩...
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.twbbs.org)
◆ From: courant.math.nt