精華區beta NTUWindBand 關於我們 聯絡資訊
Symphony No. 4 There are no fortissimi in my fourth symphony. Mahler The present belongs to Strauss, the future to Mahler. Ernst Otto Nodnagel, at the premiere of the symphony. "What shocking music!" muttered somebody near me...Finally the first movement came to an end. We had never been so embarrassed - obviously we weren't going to admit we might have liked it! Was that really serious music? William Ritter, on the premiere. In one sense this symphony was written backwards: the final movement, the Wunderhorn song Das himmlische Leben (The Heavenly Life) having been composed almost a decade before the completion of the symphony - which was written in 1899-1900 - and the quick music between the verses providing thematic material for the very opening of the symphony. One early programmatic draft of the symphony read as follows: Symphony No. 4 (Humoresque) No. 1 The world as perpetual here and now, G major No. 2 Earthly life, E flat minor No. 3 Caritas, B major (Adagio) No. 4 Morning bells, F major No. 5 The world without cares, D major (Scherzo) No. 6 The heavenly life, G major The final layout of the work, in which Mahler returned to a four movement form (almost conventional except for the presence of the soprano voice in the finale) bears only scant resemblance to this sketch; the outer movements correspond, but the middle four movements have been replaced by a scherzo (in C minor) and a poco adagio (in G). According to Bruno Walter and Natalie Bauer-Lechner, Mahler himself gave the movements the titles Death Strikes Up Freund Hein spielt auf and The Smile of St. Ursula, respectively. The symphony was first performed on November 25, 1901 in Munich. The Fourth is Mahler's simplest symphony - well shortest anyway. This and the first are the only two that come in under an hour. The finale is a depiction of a child's view of heaven, and very angelic it sounds too - providing you don't actually read the translation! In fact the child seems to think that the main point of heaven is that (s)he will finally get enough to eat. The symphony has been remarkably lucky and there are a number of highly recommendable versions. In terms of sheer authenticity, the 1939 recording made live with the Concertgebouw of Amsterdam conducted by Willem Mengelberg (Philips, nla) must top the list. Mengelberg worshiped Mahler and knew him well. He took great pains to note down every detail of Mahler's own performances in his own copies of the scores; this recording is, therefore, although dating from over a quarter of a century after the composer's death, the closest we are ever likely to get to the way Mahler himself would have conducted it. The huge, unmarked ritardando in the opening bars immediately indicates that this is a performance in what one might describe as the 'authentic' romantic tradition; it is almost impossible to imagine such a performance being given today or, indeed, what the critics might say about it. Apart from a 1926 studio recording of the adagietto from the Fifth Symphony Adagietto (currently available as part of a 3 CD Pearl set of early Mengelberg/Concertgebouw recordings, in a much better transfer than the earlier EMI one), this the only recording extant of Mengelberg conducting Mahler (although there are rumours of an aircheck of the Eighth). Be warned, however, that the sound is less than hi-fi and there are a number of clicks, pops and swishes stemming from the original 78 acetate masters. Nevertheless this is an extremely important record. The finest LP-era recording is probably the Cleveland version under the late George Szell dating from 1966 (Sony). Szell was a great Mahlerian and it is unfortunate that he only recorded two of the symphonies: his recording of the sixth has only recently been reissued after having been out of the catalogue for years, but this fourth has never been out of print, and is a wonderful testament to his skill. As an aside, it is remarkable to discover that the very first recording of this symphony was made in 1930 in Japan, conducted by a Viscount Hidemaro Konoye. This version is also available on CD (Denon), but, although it is a surprisingly respectable performance, its chief attraction is doubtless its curiosity value. The last few bars are missing from the original masters - presumably the 78s ran out just too soon. Among more modern versions those of Lorin Maazel with the VPO and Franz Welser-M岾t with the LPO are both very fine. They are both digital recordings and the latter, under the orchestra's erstwhile chief conductor (he resigned a short while ago, after what appears to have been something like an orchestrated press campaign against him - Mahler would have sympathised!), features what must be the slowest performance ever of the heavenly third movement - and yet it doesn't seem a second too long. Many people swear by the famous Fritz Reiner recording from 1954. I cannot see the appeal: the performance seems to me to have little affection for the music, and to be harsh-edged; and while Lisa della Casa may have been the greatest Strauss soprano of her generation, she seems very unidiomatic here.